What needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM WebSphere Message Broker.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The size of the container used in the deployment is still large and I think it should be improved and become lighter. It would be useful to make container deployment easier .

author avatar
Top 10LeaderboardReal User

The solution overall could be simplified. Everything is too complex.

author avatar
Top 20Consultant

The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is. The administration console is ok because it's used by the administration team or the technical team. The external interfaces have limitations compared to vertical technologies such as JS frameworks like React or Angular that have lots of capability for UI and UX design. This tool can be challenging when you use it for a really complex solution, or if you try to use it for a purpose other than what it is designed for. For example, using it as a BPM tool will be challenging.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
442,517 professionals have used our research since 2012.