2018-01-28T13:15:00Z

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure?

30

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Microsoft Azure.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
7979 Answers

author avatar
Top 20Real User

Microsoft Azure Backup and recovery solution needs to be integrated with other private cloud systems like VMware to allow the solution scale and extend function across multi-hypervisor platform

2021-01-04T09:09:09Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardMSP

It should have cost optimization tools. Customers are required to use third-party applications to avoid usage complications. Also, charging on downloads is not a good option, especially when it moves to a production server.

2020-05-06T08:55:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Virtual services might be improved by adding more rules for the validation of protocols and peripheral elements in security assurance. This feature could help to gain more visibility in compliance validation using cross-referencing between firewalls and legacy systems. By example, only mobile devices with Windows at phone, laptops, or tablets running either Windows 10 or Windows Mobile can print using Windows Server Hybrid Cloud Print, and this possibility cannot apply to another devices due to the feature uses an UNC path. UNC means for Universal Naming Convention, a standard for identifying servers, printers and other resources in a network. The UNC uses double slashes or backslashes to precede the name of the computer.

2019-07-04T15:52:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

There aren't limitations that come to mind. Whatever they have planned for the solution in the future, I will be happy with it. The solution could always work to reduce its costs. It would be ideal if the solution could offer more non-Microsoft-related integration capabilities.

2021-07-01T13:49:21Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

Use of the solution could be easier. It is too complex. The solution is not sufficiently informative and there is a need to wade through much information. Moreover, we find it lacking when it comes to active dashboards. This is problematic when looking to Teams, as it does not allow one to know what is transpiring in real time, such as when there are concurrent conferences. This information only becomes available the following day.

2021-06-24T16:37:20Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The cost of the product is too high. It would be ideal if they could lower it a bit for their customers.

2021-06-10T10:44:44Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

We need more security to be available on our smartphones and mobile devices. They need to improve the protections available in that area in particular. We're actually currently looking for solutions that will protect devices of this nature so that they can safely access the corporate network.

2021-06-09T20:38:42Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

The solution could be easier to use. However, when comparing it to AWS it is a bit easier. In an upcoming release, the interface could improve.

2021-06-06T11:08:11Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I believe the cost management and billing section features could be improved because sometimes it may seem somewhat complicated to find certain settings to set up a threshold for resource consumption and track expenses in real-time.

2021-06-03T16:58:32Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

They should include a cybersecurity feature to improve the protection of the systems. They could do better in terms of the pricing model. Its price keeps on changing. Their technical support can also be better.

2021-05-19T17:34:31Z
author avatar
Top 5MSP

There could be more documentation and video tutorials to incorporate each and every feature. This way one can easily get the knowledge and implement it.

2021-05-18T15:28:44Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

1.One is not able to upload custom images in azure and not able to access windows client images. This can be improved 2. It moves your business’ compute power from your data center or office to the cloud. As with most cloud service providers, Azure needs to be expertly managed and maintained, which includes patching and server monitoring.

2021-05-17T17:46:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

There was a time when the solution was updated on their side and all of our functions stopped working. This issue could be worked on to prevent it from happening in the future. They must give us the information of when they are going to updates on the platform side so that we can take the appropriate measures on our side as well. We would like to see more enhancements in the Azure Migrate services in the future.

2021-05-17T12:00:24Z
author avatar
Top 5Vendor

The cost is something that could be improved. There's not much clarity regarding the price range. We'll create a VM and then at the end of the month, we'll receive a bill with various costs from different locations — it's confusing. Integration with other cloud environments can be tricky at times.

2021-05-17T08:30:44Z
author avatar
Top 20Reseller

The pricing needs to be a bit lower. It's an expensive solution right now. In future releases, I would like to see Microsoft offer personal desktop environments in a virtual solution. Citrix, for example, now offers this as an option.

2021-04-29T21:00:52Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

When we are doing transfers of records in large amounts, for example, petabytes of data or few long datasets, the performance should not degrade as it does. I am working on big data platforms like Informatica and others and even though there are terabytes of data being transferred it does it immediately. However, in this solution, I would like the performance to be there when building a large dataset to integrate the data.

2021-04-29T13:48:42Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I think Azure Active Directory and also the backup solutions provided in Azure need to be improved by Microsoft. The backup solution is not a very enterprise solution, and it is very simple. I think in comparison with other backup solutions like Nakivo and Veeam Backup, it can be improved to have a lot of options. Along with this, one of the lack of options in Azure is managing antiviruses in virtual machines in the Azure environment. For example, if we have a lot of virtual machines on-premises and have to migrate them in Azure, there is no handy tool for the central management of antivirus software in all virtual machines in Azure. On-premises, we have a lot of options like Kaspersky, Norton, and a lot of others, but in the Azure environment, you are limited to Windows ATP. Windows ATP solutions are limited and can be improved by Microsoft, specifically the central management of the GUI for configuring agents on virtual machines. I think Microsoft Azure should provide more innovation and new services to get better performance in the market. The documentation for how to connect to CLI could also be improved.

2021-04-23T13:30:20Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The solution should emulate what MuleSoft is doing. At the moment MuleSoft has a lot of other features compared to Azure API integration. Just the coverage of the features, for example, could improve. Azure should offer more coverage of the features.

2021-04-01T10:12:33Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The design of the platform is not so easy to navigate. It's not very user-friendly. Some services are more difficult to use in AWS and GCP. I have projects on the three clouds, and some things are easier to do on AWS. On the other hand, using Databricks on Azure is easy, as they are integrated well. However, some products are more difficult to use than other products.

2021-04-01T09:48:49Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Sometimes the Azure Calculator doesn't have a good way to do a higher estimate, because for any organization there are sometimes issues with the application sites, but I know that the logs are not the real time and there are issues with login synchronization. It cam sometimes take more than five minutes for that information to reach the Azure application side. I'd like to see integration with other lifecycle managing rules because with Azure DevOps, it's straightforward, but the system is painful sometimes.

2021-04-01T09:40:53Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Talking about improvement is like a double-edged sword. We like that they have the new capabilities, but sometimes they're deprecating capabilities faster than we can handle. If we had to improve it, we would want to stay on some of these older capabilities a bit longer. It's a brilliant platform for our staff to be more agile and more efficient but probably doesn't match with us in terms of maturity. For example, they offer this tagging capability, but they keep introducing new platforms without it. We've become heavily reliant on tagging, but in the case of NetApp, they introduced it into the environment, and now we're not able to get the showback off of that. If they introduce new capabilities, they have to have all the features and functions on that new capability. They're not very good at that. If they introduce new capabilities, all the feature sets on these new capabilities should be available immediately. From my perspective, that's where they need to improve.

2021-03-30T23:47:49Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Its subscription price could be cheaper.

2021-03-29T12:20:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

I think the cloud interface could be improved.

2021-03-27T08:32:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

They should optimize their pricing so that we can use more features. I would also like to see more auditing and more security for the Blob storage feature. From a technical point, it has very good features for Microsoft products, but for non-Microsoft products, it may have some limitations. I have mostly worked with Windows-based integration, and now I am trying to use it for open-source systems. It is good but not as easy as Microsoft products.

2021-03-26T15:59:31Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

From a security perspective, it could be improved. A little bit of automation would also be nice.

2021-03-12T17:18:43Z
author avatar
Top 5Reseller

I believe that some of the services need to be available on the on-premises version and not only based on the cloud. There are some security issues in the cloud that cannot be solved. Some countries will not allow you to store certain types of data on the cloud.

2021-02-25T20:32:06Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The technical support could be improved. When we leave tickets, it can take some days before the issue is dealt with.

2021-02-25T11:39:41Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardVendor

I honestly can't think of anything that needs to be improved.

2021-02-23T15:23:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReseller

A few different vendors from Fortinet, from Barracuda, from Forcepoint, all use infrastructure from Azure from time to time. A problem with Azure is that the architecture that they have is not really compliant — not really connecting with the endpoint Cloud. It's a different type of architecture, so that's a mistake from Microsoft. Hopefully, they will fix it soon. It could be more secure actually. Microsoft Defender is not very secure. The platform is also a bit slow, to be honest. It takes a few seconds to load. Although, it does update quickly now. It's one-click — Microsoft takes four seconds and Google takes two and a half. It's minimal. Better integration with other vendors and third-party systems would be a nice change.

2021-02-19T16:04:48Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The support, the cost, the way they have the tiers, this could all be improved. For example, our company has been purchasing Microsoft Office 365 cloud licensing for approximately five years, and we do not have any production. We have five divisions and these divisions have different classification and levels of data. This company has changed hands over the years. We now lead the was as far as IT, but the corporate office didn't do a top-down infrastructure. It's a long story, but the way that we do things is not the way that everybody else does things. Just because others are moving to XYZ doesn't mean we're going to go there today. We might look and see how everybody else is doing everything, and once we decide we're ready to go, then we'll go. It might be 10 years later. It might be next week, but we don't follow the crowd. We follow the Navy.

2021-02-18T10:13:40Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

It is constantly updating. There are weekly releases, sometimes daily releases, and there should be fewer that are consolidated into one.

2021-02-17T11:03:19Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The solution is not particularly user friendly so that could be improved. With Microsoft Azure it's quite difficult to do anything freely or try my hand at something new. I think the solution is also lacking in security. I'd like to see the option of a free account for carrying out a POC and the ability to play around with the solution without any restrictions.

2021-02-15T10:49:23Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

I would like to see improved migration tools. It is improving week by week. They just need to make sure that they keep up with the new functionality provided in other clouds.

2021-02-12T13:22:17Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It is pretty secure, but it can always be more secure.

2021-02-06T08:27:05Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It would be advantageous if the dashboard had more clarity, in terms of the visibility that it provides. The challenge that we are facing has to do with resources and the grouping of them. We have different services that we use and we cannot see all of them until we filter the resource group. Having inbuilt security would be an improvement. As it is now, Microsoft has a sentinel as a security tool, where you need to integrate it.

2021-02-05T13:26:57Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

I would like to see this solution support integration.

2021-02-04T11:59:33Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The cost is a big issue, it can quickly go up if you don't control things. We've set up a system that shuts down machines regularly so we don't run up costs. Sometimes our development teams start up machines and forget to shut them down, and we see our costs go up quite rapidly with monthly surcharges. It would be helpful if Microsoft didn't change the control panels quite so often. It means we need to retrain personnel whenever things change and that seems to have an impact on our IT teams.

2021-02-01T18:46:40Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

We would like it to be cheaper. As a customer, we always want to pay less.

2021-01-31T06:52:34Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Integrate as a service. A lot of Microsoft software licensing options aren’t yet in Azure. Also, the ability to integrate with other technologies, such as other options on the market based on RISC Technologies.

2021-01-30T14:58:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I can't say that we have any complaints in terms of features or lack of capabilities within the product. Over the last two years, I'd say it's been so far so good. It would be ideal if they could reduce costs a bit. Right now, we find the product to be expensive.

2021-01-26T15:40:18Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

They can add more documentation about the solution.

2021-01-10T08:24:16Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

We need more customization and support for doing so. I would like to see more customization on the DevOps side.

2020-12-28T12:59:18Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

At times, the support is terrible. It is not bad all of the time, but many times when we have contacted them, there are juniors without refined knowledge. We have had instances where it takes a long time to solve just a single problem.

2020-12-24T09:18:58Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

There should be more language options for the Azure Functions apps. It supports programming languages, but there are only a few options. It could have more programming languages.

2020-12-19T17:44:25Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

I would like to see all of the cloud providers be more compatible with each other. All of the big organizations, such as large manufacturing and banking and financials, use Azure, while other places will use Google Cloud to AWS. Compatability between these is important.

2020-12-18T21:16:24Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The solution could be a bit more intuitive and easier to use. The documentation could be a bit better. It could be more clear and accessible. It would be good to know if the person answering the questions was a Microsoft employee or just another user. The pricing in our region can be a bit high.

2020-12-16T10:37:33Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The solution needs to be easier to configure in the future. Right now, it's a bit difficult to accomplish. Technical support could be better. They need to be more responsive. The documentation should be more accessible. It's hard to find what we need right now. It would be helpful if there was more data science or AI implemented in future versions. The product needs to implement more API capabilities.

2020-12-16T08:43:50Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I would like to see better integration with other products.

2020-12-16T07:23:17Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

The licensing model is not ideal. It is not very useful in predicting actual costs. Sometimes we found that we could not accurately predict how much specific products will cost the company in the future. Just now, for example, we want to start using Log Analytics for Office 365, however, we don't know the final price. It's inconvenient for us as we cannot predict the budget and it puts off making a decision. For Microsoft, it's very disadvantagous. The solution could use mutual segmentation for servers. It would be ideal if you could constitute something like five or 15 groups among the groups of different computers inside Azure. If you could get something like logical groups of servers outside the mutual servers, it would be an improvement. Sometimes we want to start and do a penetration test. If, for example, we're planning new security scanning for our customers. You have to inform Microsoft that you want to start a penetration test. If you have regular scans Microsoft should allow regular scanning, without having to plan and to ask for approval from the Microsoft side every time. When it's meant to be a regular occurrence, it's very inconvenient for us.

2020-12-10T17:15:16Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

If the price were reduced then it would be an improvement.

2020-12-08T21:20:57Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

It should have a better hybrid-cloud central analysis. Their support service also needs to be improved. Our main concern is support calls. Our issue is basically related to the technical functionality of the services that we use. It doesn't behave as expected, and support often fails to solve the problem.

2020-12-04T15:58:11Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

The level of authorization or authorization cascading can be improved. We have the most powerful admins and then we have sub-admins, but the level of authorization is not that easy to handle or manage.

2020-12-03T18:24:09Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

For some use cases, Microsoft Azure is okay and working, but it is lacking features and we cannot implement it fully. Talking from a networking perspective, when you create a file or a rule in Azure and you want to view this IP group, sometimes the way it is displayed on the GUI, you don't see the name of the group. At a minimum, I should be able to see the name of the group. They need to improve the GUI with respect to creating files or files. In summary, on that GUI view for firewall rules creation, the IP groups that are chosen in the firewall are not easily seen. If I want to track, for example, a soft IP group, and mistakingly I click the wrong thing, then it's a problem. They need to improve it so that you can just view it, read-only, and then edit it later if needed.

2020-12-01T15:21:59Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

Some of the dashboard features can be improved. Some of the backup solutions for SAP are not compatible. For example, we have a Sybase database running, and Azure does not have an agent tool for connecting with it. This means that we have to use a third-party tool to properly backup our SAP Sybase system.

2020-11-25T16:20:37Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

As compared to AWS, Azure can improve its functionality. In terms of the feature list, it is still lacking a bit as compared to AWS. AWS supports lots of types of operating systems, which Azure is still catching up with. Azure is mainly focused on the Windows system, and it is not yet there in terms of integration with other operating systems like Linux, Unix. Azure is slowly catching up.

2020-11-21T06:59:50Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The initial setup is quite complex because of the number of options that are available.

2020-11-21T01:02:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Right now, in Azure, with the solution they offer, it's a bit complicated. The application response time in particular consumes a lot of memory in terms of the CPU and application response time. The control administration, every single control, every single application or service, has its independent dashboard. It's a bit complex to set up. It's simple to set up, however, when you want a metric for tracking or reporting, it's a bit difficult. We've had issues with the login feature and have been looking into other solutions due to that ongoing problem. The solution needs a more integrated password feature.

2020-11-18T20:09:39Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It would be nice if there was an on-premises version of the solution, and it wasn't just cloud-based. Oracle, for example, has both capabilities. Some people don't understand the cloud, or are hesitant, and this might prevent them from adopting the product. Also, migrating to the cloud can bring a lot of misunderstanding and a lot of trouble to some companies. Some prefer that their data is not moved from the premises, or have requirements to that effect. If Microsoft could address these concerns, that would be ideal. The solution has a lot of terms of services. These should be simplified.

2020-11-13T19:25:15Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

This solution is not user friendly to set up and it's difficult to understand, particularly with regard to information protection and the sort of licensing needed to utilize it. Simplification would go a long way. I'd like to see them improve on the watermarking. There's a feature that allows you to watermark documents that are checked out. Currently it watermarks a document with whoever publishes it. For example, if you wanted to watermark the email address, it doesn't watermark with the person checking out the file, but with the person publishing the document. It would be more valuable if the watermarking was related to the person checking out the document, in case it leaks out.

2020-11-06T00:44:18Z
author avatar
Top 20Reseller

In the next release, I would like to see better security.

2020-10-29T19:55:45Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

The price could be improved as well as the interface speed, and technical support.

2020-08-09T07:19:56Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

The pricing can be reduced.

2020-08-09T07:19:54Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

I find that in many cases it's more expensive than AWS, and for no good reason. The pricing itself is also quite difficult to comprehend, it's not easy to know the total cost and not worth checking the calculator because the outcome is going to be totally different anyhow. I also find it difficult that they are specific to x86 and x64 machines, I haven't found any ARM-based virtual machine images that I could run in my IP test lab, which would be a great boost for productivity because I could run the internal pipeline in the cloud and would not have to divert to locally installed devices. If they want to be serious with IT devices then they should find a way of deploying ARM-based devices to Azure, to get more freedom of choice with virtual machines and services. It would be hardware virtual machine image offerings to other platforms, not only PC-based or x86-based. It would make my life much easier.

2020-08-06T06:44:42Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Azure could be made more user-friendly. For example, the configuration wizard should be more intuitive for the users.

2020-08-02T08:16:42Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

They are a bit closed on the customization side. If they open the customization then it will be very good. It covers pretty much the similar problems that we face in many areas of Azure. If we are planning to use some of the Azure applications within our organization, there are some places that we need to complain about a complaint. Because of the design of Microsoft, we were not able to make this complaint. So, we are not able to use that interface.

2020-07-28T06:50:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

Dashboards and reporting could be improved.

2020-07-19T08:15:41Z
author avatar
Real User

They should enable more other products to enable other commercial products as a Pack services, from the database side, more from the security perspective. Some of the databases don't have the features that Azure SQL has. Those parts have to enabled. There were also a lot of constraints with the serverless parts. They are far behind compared to AWS.

2020-07-19T08:15:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

There are some small things that could be done to improve Azure. I think they should actually do more to implement function as a service. It is a completely separate capability that they currently do not address. Function as a service can be a completely different scheme altogether than PaaS or IaaS which it does quite well. For an example of a FaaS, I think the Azure product can be stronger in terms of storage. I would like to see it have better management systems as a service specifically for managing documents. Right now they are handled as a more generalized object. Say Azure came out with Microsoft Document Management and it was very strong as a service. It would not have to be deployed as a complete infrastructure. I would be able to use that as a service inside my organization and it is a product that any organization can use. The question is what is the separate USP (Unique Selling Point) that Microsoft will provide to the user that would fit a unique need when making FaaS solutions available. Document management systems have already been proven to be very popular by Google. Microsoft Office uses OneDrive storage. There may be a better way to promote document management in a more general PaaS. Sometimes it is very useful to virtualize a platform or an infrastructure, but in the same way, it is sometimes valuable to virtualize a function. Applications may be a collection of functions. It is this type of branching out of services that Azure can do within the structure they already have. They are targeting Azure into specific domains and not working as much with open-source as they could. That would be helpful. I think eventually this approach will just drive the competition away. If I have a product that is very good for manufacturing as a function — something like is being done with Edge — it might be beneficial for Azure to be able to tie in this FaaS and let manufacturing clients start working with the solution without having to reach outside of Azure. Right now that I do not see that happening and it is an opportunity that Microsoft is missing with Azure.

2020-07-15T07:11:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Consultant

I think the pricing model could be improved. I have that clarity with AWS but with Azure it's not that easy. If I am building a solution on Azure, the first question that stakeholders will ask me is about the cost. If I'm using multiple services of Azure, then how do I figure that out given that it's all on cloud. Technically, I would say there could definitely be improvement on the AutoML part, which is the machine learning component of Azure. I made a comparison between AutoML versus DataRobot, another vendor that provides machine learning. DataRobot is definitely ahead of Azure AutoML. Of course that could be because I'm using the licensed version of DataRobot versus the free version of AutoML but there does seem to be a gap.

2020-07-09T06:27:06Z
author avatar
Real User

The cost of Microsoft Azure could be lowered. The subscription licensing is very complex and we would like to have it simplified. The ease of configuration and use should be improved.

2020-07-05T09:38:11Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Microsoft Azure can be pretty advanced and difficult to understand. I would like it to be simplified. The licensing especially needs to be simplified.

2020-07-05T09:37:00Z
author avatar
Top 5Real User

Improvements need to be made with respect to the availability of third-party services. I would like to see more advanced functionality in terms of information security.

2020-06-17T10:56:03Z
author avatar
Real User

I would like to have more certified servers for SAP. Our customers need an easier interface to manage Azure. They don't have people who have cloud knowledge. The knowledge group is taking time and they use our services to manage the cloud data. Azure is built for auto services but it's not easy. The interface is not easy to use. I'd like to see them develop a better interface and more graphical information about the resource and the consumer. There's a machine, the server. The smallest machine that they have has 112 GB of RAM. It is big for a customer. It has around 16 cores and a 112 GB of RAM. Amazon has a server with around 8 cores and 60 GB of RAM. The smallest certified machine for SAP Business One HANA in Amazon Web Services is 8 cores and 60 GB of RAM and Microsoft it's 16 and 112 GB of RAM. It's too big for a small customer. Because this machine is able to manage 50 concurrent users it's too big for a customer with 22 or 30 users.

2019-01-24T13:13:00Z
author avatar
Top 10Vendor

Better logging part when deployments are crashed, even when the entire cluster is crashed.

2019-01-18T09:02:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I get the impression there are a number of services offered by AWS that are not yet available on Azure, but it seems to be catching up pretty fast.

2018-12-21T19:43:00Z
author avatar
Real User

Being a big item, it has it's own share of bugs. I had a great deal of difficulty establishing the account at first.

2018-07-24T16:25:00Z
author avatar
Real User

We are looking for the Azure to get involved in the case of other applications, like the Java application. Because it is predefined and has been set by Microsoft, who is providing better compatibility to the .NET application, so we are looking for the same from Azure for the Android app. Therefore, we are looking for better compatibility and scalability.

2018-07-23T06:38:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I would like to see more databases on the cloud, what they call today Big Data should be there. I think it's going in the right direction.

2018-01-28T13:15:00Z
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft Azure. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: July 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.