2020-05-12T05:43:00Z

What needs improvement with NetAlly EtherScope nXG?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with NetAlly EtherScope nXG.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
22 Answers

author avatar
Real User

The one thing that it doesn't do well, when it's doing airtime utilization measurements, is that it will classify things as non-802.11, and that isn't correct. What it could do better is make sure that it classifies all traffic that's in the air correctly. That's something that I've complained to them about before. It can infer that you have interference that really isn't there. Also, the ability to integrate it into automated testing is fairly limited. Part of what we do is automate things whenever we possibly can. The ability to integrate it into automated test environments more readily would be useful. Finally, while it does support 802.11ax technology, if it were able to give us a bit more information about what's happening in the 802.11ax realm, it would be useful. For example, we can't use this device to determine when something like OFDMA is being used in a conversation between an access point and a client. So more 802.11ax-specific data would be useful.

2020-05-14T10:16:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I've really had some positive experience with this product. But eventually, and I know it's not something that can be built directly into this product, I would like to see NetAlly provide a device, even if it's larger or more expensive, that can test the higher rate speeds like, 40 or 100 gigabits per second. The only improvement I can come up with is the battery life. If they could improve the battery life, that would be great.

2020-05-12T05:43:00Z
Learn what your peers think about NetAlly EtherScope nXG. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.