2018-04-22T11:00:00Z

What needs improvement with NGINX Plus?

Julia Miller - PeerSpot reviewer
  • 0
  • 16
PeerSpot user
13

13 Answers

Derrick Brockel - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
2023-12-14T17:30:45Z
Dec 14, 2023

The solution must improve its performance. Sometimes, it could be because of how a customer has implemented the tool, but it is a potential bottleneck. The product must provide a holistic view of flows to help us understand the endpoints a particular transaction went through.

Search for a product comparison
RICARDO FILIPO - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
2023-09-15T18:26:18Z
Sep 15, 2023

The user interface could be improved. NGINX is also too poor with streaming. We could have a better solution for streaming besides NGINX.

Nguyen Kien - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 20
2023-07-18T02:46:44Z
Jul 18, 2023

NGINX needs to improve its factory hardware. Some start-ups keep changing their technology over time to improve control over traffic and function. NGINX needs to improve its performance. It would be good if NGINX provided a graphical user interface. We currently need to work on configuration files. It is difficult for fresher engineers to work on the solution.

RI
Real User
Top 5
2023-06-06T18:28:00Z
Jun 6, 2023

The solution needs to be easier to setup and deploy.

MahesaPutra - PeerSpot reviewer
Reseller
Top 5
2023-05-08T10:20:00Z
May 8, 2023

There is room for improvement in the pricing model.

Saurav Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-16T10:31:00Z
Mar 16, 2023

I would like to see the Grafana integration in NGINX which is already present in HAProxy. Grafana integration will help the solution visualize all the data analytics on the dashboard which is currently not present.

Learn what your peers think about NGINX Plus. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AH
Real User
Top 20
2022-11-24T18:24:24Z
Nov 24, 2022

The scalability could be improved.

AANKITGUPTAA - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
2022-10-18T02:00:51Z
Oct 18, 2022

The KPI on NGINX Plus should be more focused on load balancing and the latency in application calling from the end system. That is something currently lacking in the solution. I would also like to see a very interactive dashboard with all the KPI metrics that would help with application level troubleshooting. Finally, most people implementing this solution do not include a security model and it would be great if they could include that in the product.

Ritesh-Bakhru - PeerSpot reviewer
Reseller
Top 5
2022-07-12T14:17:18Z
Jul 12, 2022

NGINX cannot be a replacement for your traditional load balancer with what we use in the network today. However, with applications going toward microservices, NGINX is definitely a way forward. F5 has many traditional load balancing features, so they still need to bring some of those features to NGINX. NGINX is a very basic load balancer and cannot do as many customizations as F5. I think F5 is trying to implement those features in NGINX so they can improve the balancing on NGINX, but I think that will take some time. With the traditional F5 set up, the same OS can do load balancing, firewalls, and even policy enforcement. If we are able to bring some of those capabilities to NGINX, I think it would become a versatile solution and usage would definitely increase.

YS
Real User
Top 20
2022-06-28T01:04:00Z
Jun 28, 2022

I can’t speak to where the solution needs improvement. I’m just a user and I haven’t really gone in-depth in terms of looking for where the solution might have weak points. It would be great if there was even more automation to make it even easier to maintain.

Nikolay Dimitrov - PeerSpot reviewer
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
2022-05-29T12:55:59Z
May 29, 2022

The center management system was not very good, maybe their new NGINX manager product is better. I'd like to see a good web management interface in the next release.

DK
Real User
2020-11-04T01:47:15Z
Nov 4, 2020

Their license fee has gone up, so that is one concern that we have. We are looking for alternative solutions which compare well and fit into our budget. We are interested in an open-source version with the same set of features. We had to do a lot of custom coding around open source NGINX, which we were able to do. Compared to other similar solutions on the market, I think it's over-priced. If they reduced the price by 50%, then I would definitely like to continue with them. The scaling should be built into the software rather than configured from an outside source. Regarding cluster-management, I should be able to provide configuration directly rather than bringing down the software and then updating it and taking it back down again. Without going offline, if we can manage load balancing as a cluster — meaning I have to bring them down, update them, and then take it back. If that could be more dynamic, that would answer all of my requirements.

FA
Real User
2018-04-22T11:00:00Z
Apr 22, 2018

They should do in the open source version of what they did to Advanced HTTP, TCP, and UDP load balancing. They are always creating improvements and working towards new features.

NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.  NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is...
Download NGINX Plus ReportRead more