2020-04-14T06:13:00Z

What needs improvement with Nutanix Calm?

6

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Nutanix Calm.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
55 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Real User

One thing that comes directly to mind is how they manage version control. I would love to see Calm create a built-in source control feature, one that we could tie into a repository and it would self-manage changes in versions. All the version control is built within Calm right now. I would love to see that integrated with an external repository and make it easy to tie it into GitHub or Git repositories.

2021-04-22T15:04:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

As I mentioned, we use now CaaS from SUSE; it's SUSE's Kubernetes. But it's now changing. They have bought Rancher and I think that CaaS will be replaced by Rancher. So currently, to manage a Kubernetes cluster we have SUSE. But with Karbon we can manage Kubernetes with Calm. But I don't don't know how much we can do with Calm there. There could be room for improvement, although I'm not entirely sure. It's on our agenda to look into Karbon in relation to Calm and what we can do with them together. I don't know how deeply they are integrated. It's not necessarily something that is wrong. Karbon is a new product. It's been around for about two years. The integration is growing. Last year is when it started working with Calm. It's more a concept still. My wish is that it will really be supported, but I cannot say for sure. Again, I'm not saying something is wrong here. I think it's a very good platform, but there is always room of improvement.

2020-09-30T08:03:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The list of blueprints and applications could be more configurable so you see all the fields you need and not just some predefined fields which are not customizable now. There are lots of pre-defined blueprints in the online marketplace but often it is a trial and error to get the pre-defined blueprints to work due to some firewall issues. But that may because of our internal firewall being too restrictive. More support for VMware environments would be great. Most blueprints are tailored for Nutanix AHV or the cloud providers. Hyper-V is currently not supported.

2020-07-21T10:42:00Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Even though it's a lot easier, it could be a bit slicker for the end-users. The ability to create their own blueprints could be without their having to understand the details of what they're trying to do. If they could just tick this, this, this, and this — whatever they need — and it would go spinning those up, that would be better. Now, we still guide them quite a bit.

2020-06-18T08:15:00Z
author avatar
Real User

There is room for improvement in making the solution easier still. If you don't know Calm, it's not so easy to use. Blueprint repositories are not all in the same place. Sometimes they are in the Marketplace, sometimes they are on the cluster. And from start to finish, it's not so easy to create a blueprint.

2020-04-14T06:13:00Z
Learn what your peers think about Nutanix Calm. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.