2018-05-23T10:30:00Z

What needs improvement with OpenText eDiscovery?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with OpenText eDiscovery.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5Real User

SweepEnterprise where the limit is up to 5 machines to scan. Customised Report that can be obtained as per the user requirement. Like it should omit duplicate machines, able to Filter old machines w.r.t the new one and provide New scannes machines status.We have come across problems with the end-case. We could not find an email discovery type of module and there was not flexibility with the email. So, the moment we came across a parameter or something like that we had to either extract those extensions and then again go for another rule that can be further extracted to a readable format like Outlook. If this was included, we would find this a more useful solution. Secondly, is getting the key word search option. If you go, there are legal options, it's like a deal for file extensions. Every time we have to repeat the process and it is repetitive. Whereas, if you can get research that can be categorized by default based only by an extensions that would be a benefit. Also, if we can also add the timely matched signature that it would be helpful.

2018-10-28T09:33:00Z
author avatar
Real User

I would like to see a capability to ingest and absorb more data. That would be really good. It currently is lacking this function.

2018-10-08T17:34:00Z
author avatar
Real User

Ease of use and learning curve need improvement.

2018-05-23T10:30:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault vs. OpenText eDiscovery and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,986 professionals have used our research since 2012.