2020-07-12T11:48:52Z

What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Palantir Foundry.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
22 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The workflow could be improved. Although it works rather seamlessly, the workflow too complicated sometimes. Maybe they can reduce the complexity of the workflow. It could be more modularized in the future. The performance of the engine could be better.

2021-05-23T13:11:44Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

They do not have a data center in Europe, and we have lots of personally identifiable information in our dataset that needs to be hosted by a third-party data center like Amazon or Microsoft Azure. There are some issues with scalability because when we are using a really large dataset, the system is rather slow. The performance can be improved. It would make our life a lot easier if it were as fast as Google Cloud. The GCP is unmatchable in terms of the speed at the moment. From a user perspective, it would be nice to have a preview of what the data is looking like. As it is now, you can see the schema but not the actual data. For example, they can see the different columns but they don't know what's there. If they could inspect the first few hundred columns of data then they would have an idea of what they are dealing with.

2020-07-12T11:48:52Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Palantir, Microsoft, Alteryx and others in Data Integration Tools. Updated: June 2021.
510,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.