2021-02-20T09:25:46Z

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks DNS Security?

2

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks DNS Security.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

There should be an on-premise version of this solution. There are companies that have asked for a solution that is on-premise. The reason for this is some companies might want to have control of where their traffic is going. For example, banking companies do not want their DNS queries or any such traffic to be sent over the cloud, because the cloud can be inside India or anywhere. This is why they might want the solution to be on-premise to allow them to have full control of the security.

2021-05-19T12:06:51Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

Every vendor that sells DNS or firewalls needs to be able to protect against DNS look-up attacks and DNS naming hacks. This is true of Palo Alto as well as others. The IDS and IPS should be built-in. With EDS and IDS, some are proud to have built-in IDS and IPS intrusion protection and intrusion detection as some vendors sell IDS and IPS separately. They shouldn't be separate. Instead of selling two products, it really should just be one.

2021-04-01T10:10:31Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

We would like to have cloud-based management. I would like to see integration with Cisco Meraki so that they can work together on DNS issues.

2021-02-20T09:25:46Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, Infoblox and others in DNS Security. Updated: May 2021.
511,773 professionals have used our research since 2012.