We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story
2019-05-15T05:16:00Z

What needs improvement with Pega BPM?

25

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Pega BPM.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
Guest
1818 Answers

author avatar
Top 20Real User

The local development approach is good in Pega, however, cost-wise, it's getting expensive. That needs to be addressed. With Camunda, containerization is the most helpful feature. It can containerize and it can have its own deployment process. Pega may be adding that feature in a future release, however, right now, that's lacking and needs to be addressed. I'd like to see Pega support microservices architecture, which it doesn't do right now.

2021-09-29T20:24:47Z
author avatar
Consultant

The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother. There should be quicker approvals for CDH. It is a bureaucratic approval process to be able to get those particular licenses.

2021-06-08T20:04:33Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardMSP

The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation.

2021-05-07T09:24:25Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

In regards to the integration, more APIs may be required. It needs more integration with other platforms.

2020-10-08T07:25:17Z
author avatar
Top 5Consultant

They use something called a unique model-based architecture. During development, where the database and the UI, everything comes from one single piece of architecture. Due to that sometimes the enterprise architecture teams do not like it due to the fact that it forces them to use just one piece of architecture. If these could be more modularized, then it can be easily deployable in different kinds of scenarios in organizations, it would be much better. However, they are kind of tightly coupled and it's difficult to separate everything out. Still, I would say it is an improvement to consider for the future. Id they could decouple the various components so that it gives flexibility to enterprise architects to deploy what is most needed as part of their enterprise architecture strategy, rather than getting kind of, looking at the only way the product handles, it would be a stronger product. They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help. It's very difficult to change many things unless somebody puts in the time to figure everything out. However, Pega could learn from all the customer service calls they get and categorize them in order to do an automatic form-based or customer service based response. If they could set it up to everything automatically, then that would save a lot of time and headaches for companies and help them troubleshoot and work through issues faster.

2020-07-22T08:17:18Z
author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

It's called a local platform but on the other hand, it needs a lot of experience. It's not all that easy to click and plug and play. If you really want to use all the features out of this platform, you definitely need a lot of experience and a lot of training to get there. Because the platform offers a lot of different features, it's rather complex and makes it very valuable for many different use cases, but what I would improve is that you can't tell all the people that it's a local platform, which suggests that it's for everybody, even for those people that do not have any clue about IT. They are using a lot of functionalities that try to help those developers and usually they make good jobs, but there are some situations where this automation will cause a lot of stress and trouble. This is something that creates more work at the end than if you just started from scratch.

2020-07-13T06:55:00Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

The reporting does not work well for us. If we have somebody working on a ticket or request, we are not able to track the end-to-end time. Also, the assignment is not happening correctly. Ideally, they should have panel management reporting. The end-user notifications need to be improved because there is a delay. It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work. There are technical glitches because of this.

2020-06-15T07:34:13Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5.

2020-03-09T08:07:56Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

I haven't been using the solution for that long, so I don't know if there are any features that are lacking. We need more light retail BPM tools within the Pega system. However, Pega is mostly for big companies. As our group is pretty small, we may need to look for a different solution that's more geared to smaller sized organizations.

2020-03-05T08:39:48Z
author avatar
Real User

From a technical point of view, it would be helpful to have some advanced analytics to help with configuration. We have a lot of unwanted features and it would be good to configure it more appropriately so that we are using just exactly what we need.

2020-03-05T08:39:46Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved.

2020-03-03T08:47:45Z
author avatar
Real User

In terms of areas that need to be improved, I would say the timeout. This is because sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout. I would like to build a solution for that or to improve that feature, because by doing so the process will be trimmed. Sometimes it gets stuck just due to taking so much time for the user in the back-end data from the database. I think all the other features are very good. Additionally, I'd like to select the availabilities. I'm using the earlier version now because it is on-premise implementation. If I go on the newer PGi for a couple of days, the latest version, then I will able to see what other additional features we need to have in the BPM tool.

2020-01-19T06:38:00Z
author avatar
Real User

The solution would benefit from more integration capabilities. There are some tools within the solution that are difficult to use.

2020-01-12T07:22:00Z
author avatar
Vendor

Pega currently is trying to add chatbots to their systems, and it's still quite immature. This part definitely needs to be improved. The RPA also needs improvement. Pega has its own RPA, via an acquisition a couple of years ago. They bought OpenSpan and tried to rewrite it to Pega's platform. It still has some gaps. For example, they have no machine learning. If they want to be more mature in the market, they probably need to consider working on improving that.

2019-10-06T16:38:00Z
author avatar
Vendor

The solution could use more plugins. The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive.

2019-10-03T07:51:00Z
author avatar
Real User

In terms of improvement, we would see a benefit in Pega having better availability on the cloud side. Their presence on the cloud is not as strong as their competitors. Pega and the partners both have needs to enhance their cloud footprint compared to what it is now. There is room for improvement with RPA as well (Robotic Process Automation) to automatically take action for users.

2019-06-02T09:20:00Z
author avatar
Real User

What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works. For example, some way for the Pega out of the box tools to support UGS. That would be very wise. My issue is that the UI is hard to see in some small details. You can't do fast work with it all the time. Sometimes a customer has some requirements that you go outside of this box. It gives you the Pegs UI tool which has some limitations about styling and customizing the UI. For some customers, it meets their requirements and for some, it doesn't. That's my view for organizational use. Maybe they could provide better technical support. When you are trying to do some minor attachments, you shouldn't be required to use the UI. However, you can just use the solutions that are already in there.

2019-05-30T08:12:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface. In coming releases, I would like to see something in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML).

2019-05-15T05:16:00Z
Learn what your peers think about Pega BPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2021.
554,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.