2019-09-05T05:37:00Z

What needs improvement with Polarion Requirements?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Polarion Requirements.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
33 Answers

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The product could be improved if the NTS solution worked more quickly, it's sometimes very slow. As a starting point, I'd like to see more requirements. An additional feature for the next release would be to include a better import option from the data requirement solutions.

2020-01-15T08:04:00Z
author avatar
Top 10LeaderboardReal User

This solution has its limits. If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable. For example, if you are trying to use a finance book then the loading times will be so long that you will time-out. This means that you have to sign in locally with a desktop and work on it there, although it is still slow. We spoke with Siemens about this and it cannot be improved. Even with more memory and more processors, it would still be the same. This solution is not as handy as it could be, and it would benefit from improvements to the dashboards. The import feature should be improved and made more like IBM Rational DOORS because there are too many things to set up.

2019-10-13T05:49:00Z
author avatar
Real User

The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you want to know the right way is to do licensing. It's not clear what that best way would be. The solution will be here for a long time, and I just think it could be more clear.

2019-09-05T05:37:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Siemens, Atlassian, IBM and others in Application Requirements Management. Updated: October 2020.
442,041 professionals have used our research since 2012.