Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll).
What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?
The area that should be improved is licensing. When using an active/passive cluster, we have to pay 70% of the master appliance and license for the passive server that does not work. Since we know that only one server works at a time, we should pay only one license for the appliances and for the support as well. In my opinion, this has to be improved. If possible, the client software should be a web application instead of downloading software for the management. This can avoid login problems when they update or patch.
I am a Sales Director at a company with less than 1,000 employees.
I am researching Web Application Firewalls (WAF). I am considering R&S (DenyAll) and Imperva. Which would you recommend?
Are there others I should consider?