What needs improvement with R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll).

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

11 Answer

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

The area that should be improved is licensing. When using an active/passive cluster, we have to pay 70% of the master appliance and license for the passive server that does not work. Since we know that only one server works at a time, we should pay only one license for the appliances and for the support as well. In my opinion, this has to be improved. If possible, the client software should be a web application instead of downloading software for the management. This can avoid login problems when they update or patch.

Find out what your peers are saying about Rohde & Schwarz, Fortinet, Imperva and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2020.
448,542 professionals have used our research since 2012.