What needs improvement with Redwood Finance Automation?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with Redwood Finance Automation.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

ITCS user
11 Answer

author avatar
Top 5LeaderboardReal User

This is a tricky question, but certainly, some improvements are definitely needed in the template-based approach and modularity of design. Mapping the process steps to an existing R2R process quickly would be a definite step forward. Testing, logging, and reporting accurately on a dashboard for any issues during execution will help to identify issues early. As the RUN DATES are only two to five days every month, identifying issues and fixing them should be quick and easy. Compliance is a major factor, as financial processes are always on compliance audit for issues in processing critical financial data and legal ramifications.

Find out what your peers are saying about Redwood Software, UiPath, Blue Prism and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: June 2021.
513,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.