I don't like the user interface provided by Trend Micro Web Security since it is difficult to use, making it one of the areas in the solution where improvements are required. The product's scalability is an area of concern where improvements are required.
The price of Trend Micro Web Security is the only area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the product should be made available to users at a cheaper rate.
Senior Information Security Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Consultant
Top 10
2022-08-31T18:50:59Z
Aug 31, 2022
This solution has a lot of restrictions on what non-administrator users can do, including generating comparative code. We would like to see this changed as the product is developed. We would also like more reporting features to be added to this solution.
Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
MSP
2022-03-02T11:12:08Z
Mar 2, 2022
What could help Trend Micro Web Security in terms of improvement is the addition of a DDoS protection feature. Better DDoS protection is what I'm expecting, though I'm unsure if they now have that, because DDoS protection is more specialized than just web security.
Sr.Customer Engineer- Projects at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
2021-09-17T11:18:05Z
Sep 17, 2021
The ease of use depends on the blacklisting of the sites. Some of the authorized sites have been blacklisted, which requires a request to unblock the site. The process of authorizing sited needs to improve. The performance could be better. Sometimes the browser hangs. it is possible that the integration in coordination with the browser causes that issue. I would like to see better scalability and better performance.
The system should generate reports when an attack has been stopped, contained, or removed. As it is now, if an attack is halted then we don't know about it unless we search through the logs.
A web security gateway (also known as secure web gateway or SWG) is a type of network security service that protects a network against web-based threats.
I don't like the user interface provided by Trend Micro Web Security since it is difficult to use, making it one of the areas in the solution where improvements are required. The product's scalability is an area of concern where improvements are required.
The price of Trend Micro Web Security is the only area of concern where improvements are required. From an improvement perspective, the product should be made available to users at a cheaper rate.
The product should be more secure and stable. It is also not flexible.
The costs are a bit high in terms of licensing.
This solution has a lot of restrictions on what non-administrator users can do, including generating comparative code. We would like to see this changed as the product is developed. We would also like more reporting features to be added to this solution.
The interface could be improved. We need it to be more user-friendly. The installation is a little bit complex.
It could be less expensive.
What could help Trend Micro Web Security in terms of improvement is the addition of a DDoS protection feature. Better DDoS protection is what I'm expecting, though I'm unsure if they now have that, because DDoS protection is more specialized than just web security.
There are multiple ways Web Security could improve, such as usability and web access to several programming modes.
The ease of use depends on the blacklisting of the sites. Some of the authorized sites have been blacklisted, which requires a request to unblock the site. The process of authorizing sited needs to improve. The performance could be better. Sometimes the browser hangs. it is possible that the integration in coordination with the browser causes that issue. I would like to see better scalability and better performance.
The system should generate reports when an attack has been stopped, contained, or removed. As it is now, if an attack is halted then we don't know about it unless we search through the logs.