2017-09-14T10:19:00Z

What needs improvement with webMethods Integration Server?


Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with webMethods Integration Server.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

Guest
55 Answers

author avatar
Real User

The Flow language mapping tool could be a little easier to use. The interface needs improvement.

2019-06-11T11:10:00Z
author avatar
Consultant

I think they need to improve the API gateway to be able to replace F5 for example. Also, handling the certificates and their implications with other applications needs some improvement. We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.

2019-05-26T06:53:00Z
author avatar
Top 10Real User

* DevOps support * Java services debugging.

2019-02-09T20:37:00Z
author avatar
Real User

The newest version, which we are not on, has all the features that we are looking for, meaning managed files transfer adapter.

2018-07-30T09:01:00Z
author avatar
Top 20Real User

The Java Service section, which is probably needs more different manners for a new developer. It doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface for input parameter called IData, which consists of Maps (key, value). You can still be creating classes under the shared section of the methods. But also the documentation of webMethods Java API it doesn't cover much clarity for the usage

2017-09-14T10:19:00Z
Find out what your peers are saying about Software AG, MuleSoft, IBM and others in ESB. Updated: October 2020.
442,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.