2018-05-08 07:07:00 UTC

Which is better, Bonita or Camunda BPM?


One of the most popular comparisons on IT Central Station is Bonita vs Camunda BPM.

One user says about Bonita,"I have solved a lot of Banking problems using Bonita BPM, from customer hiring to credit evaluation"

Another user says about Camunda BPM, " We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features"

In your opinion, which is better and why?

Thanks!

--Rhea

Guest
1313 Answers
author avatar
Consultant

i totally agree with reviewer842259, both are powerful to design processes, because both have similarities, but the interfaces designer of Bonita is higher of Camunda. But if you need some results about he processes performance, the dahsboards of Camunda, in my opinion are better than Bonita. And other feature to take in account is the tool to analyze the workflow instances, in my opinion Camunda has better information than Bonita

2018-05-09 16:33:12 UTC
author avatar
Consultant

With Bonita you can design and deploy any business process, however for integration with specific providers you should buy a license for use connectors. With Camunda, you could customize the integration with some java development, deploy with Tomcat, and finally hold standard BPM design.

2018-05-08 19:21:38 UTC
author avatar
User

With Bonita you can not only develop the process but you can also design better interfaces. In Camunda, the user interfaces are very basic and do not allow much customization.

2018-05-08 15:38:27 UTC
author avatar
TOP 20Real User

I don't know the Cumunda bpm, so I can't able to give the best
answer....sorry for this.

My Bonita experience:
We are using for networking domain and we will be talking OSB proxies/web services and based on conditions we will be moving into next step in BPM flow.

If you want to go through Bonita bpm, make sure that there won't much business logic in BPM flow because Bonita is not capable of handling that.

2018-05-10 03:00:04 UTC
author avatar
User

I would “throw a wider net” in your evaluation.

Even then, your needs are the most important and once we have these, we can provide a report on the different tools out there and how they “fit” with your needs.

Please let me know if my team can assist further.

2018-05-10 02:53:13 UTC
author avatar
User

I have used neither app and cannot give an opinion.

2018-05-09 11:56:01 UTC
author avatar
User

I can’t tell you much about Bonita. I did an evaluation some time back and I don’t recall that it stood out. By far, I would recommend that you look
at Bizagi. Great BPMN modeling platform and also a platform to build automation. I’ve seen a stack up between Bizagi and Camunda and by far Bizagi is the superior platform.

2018-05-08 20:32:22 UTC
author avatar
User

Unfortunately, I can not really help you with that since we never implemented Bonita and during the solution RFP we decided to choose
WebMethod instead of Camunda.
The choice was only driven by the fact WebMethod was already integrated internally and we hade the knowledge.
But Camunda had the same functionalities and flexibility we saw in WebMethode.

2018-05-08 20:28:54 UTC
author avatar
Vendor

Bonita BPM has error management and feature management. Meaning you can add new features or functions to the process or fix an error without taking the process down. You can do this in real-time. Bonita has an excellent UI/UX and on many occasions been praised as having one the easiest, best looking, easy to use UI/UX on both the development and production side. In addition, Bonita doesn't limit you. If you have already created apps, a portal, or UI and you want to use yours, you can. Of course, you can develop your own amazing UI/UX in Bonita but you aren't required to use it. You can leverage work you already put time and money into.

2018-05-08 19:53:33 UTC
author avatar
Real User

I agree with the above comment. Check out JobRouter. It is a very flexible BPM platform.

2018-05-08 18:14:02 UTC
author avatar
User

Since BPM is an art in itself, the option to modify the toolset is important. Hence my preference.

2018-05-08 17:02:32 UTC
author avatar
TOP 5Consultant

From my experience, neither. We have evaluated several options, and have chosen Bizagi. Yes, it is just making a dent into the US marketplace, but the TCO is favorable, and the speed at which we can model, develop, and deploy, as well as change, is remarkable.

2018-05-08 16:16:36 UTC
author avatar
User

Take a closer look to JobRouter. It is much faster to realize projects with JobRouter.

2018-05-08 13:45:17 UTC
Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. Camunda BPM and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email