AT&T vs OpenText
Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
 AT&T Based on 113 reviews. |  OpenText Based on 58 reviews. |
| Top Comparisons | |
| Overview | |
| AT&T Inc. is an American multinational telecommunications corporation, headquartered at Whitacre Tower in downtown Dallas, Texas. AT&T Inc. began its existence as Southwestern Bell Corporation, one of seven Regional Bell Operating Companies created in 1983 in the divestiture of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company following the 1982 United States v. AT&T antitrust lawsuit. Southwestern Bell changed its name to SBC Communications Inc. in 1995. In 2005, SBC purchased former parent AT&T Corp. and took on its branding, with the merged entity naming itself AT&T Inc. and using the iconic AT&T Corp. logo and stock-trading symbol. | US$ $1,624. million OpenText software applications manage content or unstructured data for most types of governance, efficiency and monetization requirements in large companies, government agencies and professional service firms. OpenText solutions are aimed at addressing information management requirements, including the management of large volumes of content, compliance with regulatory requirements, and mobile and online experience management. |
| Sample Customers | |
AT&T Synaptic Storage as a Service: East Bay Regional Park District AT&T Platform as a Service: Golden Flake Snack Foods Inc., Dunn Tire, Road America, Committee on Arrangements | Cordys PaaS [EOL]: Stadtwerke Halle, PBS, PSCU, Getronics, Pension Protection Fund, Hawksford Group, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Pacific Blue Cross, Red Bee Media, KPN, Madura Fashion & Lifestyle, MalarEnergi, Myntra.com, Deutsche Post DHL, Excel Software and Systems, ING Vysya, NCCW OpenText Cloud [EOL]: Oil Search, The Greater Toronto Airports Authority (GTAA) Mozy Pro [EOL]: St. Johns River Water Management District Carbonite Server: INLINE Commercial Construction, Hamilton County Carbonite Safe [EOL]: Oswego Village |
| Popular Solutions | |
 15 reviews 8 reviews 1 reviews |  6 reviews 3 reviews 3 reviews |
| Top Industries | |
26% 25% 6% 6% | 33% 15% 6% 6% |
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:| Most Helpful Reviews | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review 1 of 4 |
Review 1 of 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Customer Service | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Review 1 of 30 |
Review 1 of 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Technical Support | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No Data Available | No Data Available | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.