Atlassian vs CyberArk

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Atlassian
Based on 666 reviews.
CyberArk
Based on 236 reviews.
Overview
Atlassian is an Australian enterprise software company that develops products geared towards software developers and project managers. Atlassian is headquartered in Sydney, Australia. On February 14, 2014, Atlassian president Jay Simons announced the opening of an Austin office that will eventually employ 600 people. Atlassian was founded in 2002 by Mike Cannon-Brookes and Scott Farquhar. In 2006, Cannon-Brookes and Farquhar were named Ernst & Young's Entrepreneurs of the Year.
CyberArk is an information security company focused on privileged account security. The company's technology is deployed worldwide primarily in the financial services, energy, retail, and healthcare markets. As of September 2014, CyberArk had nearly 1,600 customers, including over 30 of the Fortune 100 and approximately 15% of the Global 2000. In June 2014, CyberArk filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for an IPO, listing revenues of $66.2 million for 2013.
Sample Customers
Atlassian Crowd
NHL, Interspire, Appfire
CyberArk Identity
MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Educational Organization
36%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
22%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 5
Review 1 of 5
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.