Check Point vs NETSCOUT

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Check Point
Based on 216 reviews.
NETSCOUT
Based on 129 reviews.
Top Comparisons
Overview
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is an international provider of software and combined hardware and software products for IT security, including network security, endpoint security, data security and security management. As of 2014 the company had approximately 2,900 employees worldwide. Headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, the company has development centers in Israel, California, Sweden, and Belarus. The company has offices in the United States, in San Carlos, California, in Dallas, Texas, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and Sydney Australia.NETSCOUT Systems, Inc. is a provider of integrated computer network performance management products. NETSCOUT products include packet Sniffer and nGenius packet flow recorder. It is headquartered in Westford, Massachusetts and has approximately 800 employees. NETSCOUT serves the enterprise community, government agencies and telecommunications service providers. At various times NETSCOUT acquired the companies Network General and Fidelia Technology.
Sample Customers
Check Point DDoS Protector: Boston Properties
Arbor DDoS: Xtel Communications
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Computer Software Company
36%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Media Company
6%
Government
5%
Computer Software Company
26%
Comms Service Provider
25%
Government
7%
Media Company
6%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 5
Review 1 of 5
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.