MikroTik vs Netgate

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
MikroTik
Based on 25 reviews.
Netgate
Based on 74 reviews.
Top Comparisons
Overview
Mikrotkls Ltd., known internationally as MikroTik, is a Latvian manufacturer of computer networking equipment. It sells wireless products and routers. The company was founded in 1995, with the intent to sell in the emerging wireless technology market. As of 2014, the company has more than 100 employees. The company's products are known for being low-priced alternatives to expensive routers and Ethernet radio relay lines.pfSense is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. pfSense is commonly deployed as a perimeter firewall, router, wireless access point, DHCP server, DNS server, and as a VPN endpoint. pfSense supports installation of 3rd party packages like Snort or Squid through its Package Manager. The name was derived from the fact that it helps make the stateful packet-filtering tool PF make more sense to non-technical users.
Sample Customers
MikroTik Routers and Switches: ABB, Boingo Wireless, JPL, HP, Allied Telesis, iPass, Mips Technologies, MicroAge, Matsushita, Telia, undp, WFP, NASA
Netgate TNSR: UCLA, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, shopify
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Comms Service Provider
52%
Computer Software Company
14%
Media Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
40%
Computer Software Company
16%
Media Company
6%
Government
5%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 2
Review 1 of 1
Customer Service
Review 1 of 21
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.