NetApp vs Sangfor

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
NetApp
Based on 608 reviews.
Sangfor
Based on 9 reviews.
Latest Research
Sangfor HCI vs. NetApp HCI
Updated: March 2021
NetApp HCI vs. Sangfor HCI
Updated: March 2021
Overview
NetApp, Inc., formerly Network Appliance, Inc., is an American computer storage and data management company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California. It is a member of the NASDAQ-100. It was ranked on the Fortune 500 for the first time in 2012. NetApp was founded in 1992 by David Hitz, James Lau, It had its initial public offering in 1995. NetApp thrived in the internet bubble years of the mid 1990s to 2001, during which the company grew to $1 billion in annual revenue. After the bubble burst, NetApp's revenues quickly declined to $800 million in its fiscal year 2002. Since then, the company's revenues have steadily climbed.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
NetApp HCI: American Showa, Children's Mercy, Coca-Cola, Consultel Cloud, Evangelische Landeskirche in Wurttemberg, Imperva, Surface Mount Technology
Sangfor HCI: TOSHIBA TEC Singapore, J&T Express Indonesia, Crowne Plaza Vietnam, Hermina Hospital Indonesia
Sangfor aDesk VDI: Macau City University, 12306 Chinese Railway Customer Service Center, Bank of Communications Vietnam, Paiho Group Vietnam
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Computer Software Company
28%
Comms Service Provider
20%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
5%
Comms Service Provider
40%
Computer Software Company
23%
Media Company
5%
Government
4%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 5
Review 1 of 3
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Review 1 of 7
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.