We performed a comparison between Skybox Security Suite and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewall Security Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The port division management was the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."
"Change Manager is most important because of the impact on each other of a network change or a firewall change. We want to understand this and to know, beforehand, what the impact of a change will be. We are a large network so that is a very important tool."
"The solution's simplicity of use is its most valuable feature."
"The revalidation and policy recertifications are most valuable."
"The most valuable features are the rule compliance and the OS vulnerability checks."
"The most valuable features are Firewall Assurance and Vulnerability Control."
"The most impressive feature is optimization and clean-up."
"The most valuable feature is the compliance, whether it's access compliance or the configuration compliance, to make sure that all of our devices are configured as they're supposed to be, to limit access as much possible, to follow least-access guidelines."
"All the basic functions work well."
"The automation because it is saving a lot of work, time, and effort required to do all of our manual work. The change impact analysis is pretty good, and with the automation, it takes care of a lot of things which we would be doing manually."
"I like the fact that Tufin was able to integrate with our firewalls, which include Palo Alto and FortiGate."
"The automated reporting on a regular basis is helping us to be compliant with legal requirements."
"The clarity around the auditing provides the most value for us."
"The biggest benefit for us was the time frame to complete a ticket. It went from approximately a week and a half to two weeks down to about three days."
"Our engineers save quite a bit of time that was previously spent on manual processes."
"The visibility is huge. In order to figure out what was going on previously, we would have to pull stuff out of firewalls and put them in spreadsheets, then do sorts. Now, it's all right there in Tufin. We can write reports to look for what we need, ad hoc searches to find object groups, and know which firewalls are on. This was almost impossible to do previously."
"The solution needs to move improve its interface to a full web browser version that is more accessible and doesn't require installation for use."
"The solution does not support certain devices or vendors in some regions or countries due to regulations."
"The solution was quite technical. It would be easier to manage if the solution was more specific about aspects of the solution and provided more advisory around how to use it effectively. It would help users a lot if they were more clear about everything."
"The tool does not offer options for customization."
"The vendor's support is terrible."
"Skybox Security Suite can improve the change management module. It is the one part of the tool that is used with the firewall devices and you have a change management module that is used to record changes of all firewalls in the company. It's not compatible with all brands, this is where they can improve the solution."
"During implementation, we realised approximately 30 devices were not supported by the Skybox platform."
"I've had issues with licensing where, when they were expiring and I asked for the updated licenses, I would the wrong ones. I think their process needs to be straightened out a little bit - I don't know if they fixed it already, it has been awhile. It wasn't as straightforward as it could have been."
"More API integration with third-party platforms is something that we would definitely like to see in upcoming releases."
"One of the areas that I've had challenges with is making complicated reports."
"The pricing should be reviewed, as it is a little too high."
"At least in our environment, the dynamic learning of the topology needs improvement."
"We use a lot of inline rules, and it would be beneficial to see those from within Tufin."
"I would like to see an improved reporting model that can be flexible for us to generate our own reports. The data's already there."
"I would like to see AI elements included with this solution."
"The solution does not have automation with other Firewalls."
Skybox Security Suite is ranked 6th in Firewall Security Management with 34 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 2nd in Firewall Security Management with 180 reviews. Skybox Security Suite is rated 7.8, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Skybox Security Suite writes "Efficient in vulnerability management, stable and easy to use ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Skybox Security Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama, RedSeal and Balbix BreachControl, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Palo Alto Networks Panorama, ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer and Cisco Defense Orchestrator. See our Skybox Security Suite vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.
We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
