We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and Jira based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."
"We have found the structure, functionality, and how Jira handles the tickets most valuable."
"When we run the Jenkins pipeline, the build is already automatically connected to Jira. We've been able to integrate the ecosystem we created using this automation tool."
"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."
"The UI is good. It's simple and not very complicated. It's very good for tracking."
"We can cope with processes easily without adapting the tool, but adapting the tool to processes."
"It improved communication, as it was a popular tool, and most people enjoyed using it."
"The user story map is excellent. The features can be composed into stories and they can be allocated to each of the sprints in a program increment. It allows you to see all that in the user story map, and you have various dashboards to see the stories in various views. You can see them as a backlog view, for example, or you can see as an actual sprint view."
"Everything is tracked in one place."
"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"They are not supporting in-house servers anymore and I think I've got until January to port this to something else."
"Its ability to perform true executive-level status reporting could be improved. There are a lot of benefits there, but there are also a lot of things they can and should expand upon."
"One thing that I don't like about Jira is that when you do an export, it only allows a thousand issues. So the export feature needs to be better."
"What I don't like is that perhaps there are not so many different apps that can add value over the management side of the product."
"If CI/CD is integrated with it, it would be better. I've used Azure DevOps before, and it's nice to have everything, such as CI/CD Repos and other things, integrated. Jira has fewer integrations. Azure DevOps has an easier interface, and it has got everything in one spot. I don't have to jump around in different applications."
"There's a really steep learning curve for configuration."
"I would prefer it if the solution was more intuitive."
3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Requirements Management with 266 reviews. 3SL Cradle is rated 8.0, while Jira is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". 3SL Cradle is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, whereas Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM. See our 3SL Cradle vs. Jira report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.