3SL Cradle vs IBM Rational DOORS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
3SL Logo
445 views|291 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
10,182 views|6,535 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 3SL Cradle and IBM Rational DOORS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed 3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational DOORS Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately."

More 3SL Cradle Pros →

"The most valuable feature for me is the ability to enter data into one table, or context, and link it across modules.""I like the way we can simply link requirements with one another and with test descriptions and then automatically produce reports that are required to show compliance to our customers. It is a combination of requirements management and reporting that I like, but I really have very little to do with the reporting part of it. I don't know how easy or hard it is to create those reports.""The most valuable feature is the management verification and login.""Traceability on requirements for a huge project in an organization is a big gain.""Compared to other tools that I have used over the past 20 years, DOORS is the best of the best.""I like being able to sort and categorize the requirements and the exporting functions.""The data logs are ver conveneint.""What I like about DOORS is baselines, it's easy and I use the capability of multiple users. The traceability or links between different levels are very nice. Additionally, it is used by all of our suppliers, which brings us commonality."

More IBM Rational DOORS Pros →

Cons
"3SL Cradle could be improved with better support for SysML functionalities."

More 3SL Cradle Cons →

"The interface is not very user-friendly and has not evolved in a long time.""Not all Rational Team Concert operations are available from the web client. Certain operations, like creating streams or components, still require using the desktop application. They're not accessible through the web interface. And in my opinion, this limitation should be removed.""Rational DOORS' most valuable feature is that you can write any kind of requirement you want.""It would be nice if it could be scaled-down so that it could be installed and implemented without much learning or training.""The web application DOORS Web Access doesn't have the same functionality as the standard client, so it's not a real substitute. For example, web Access only provides writing requirements, but you can't do much more with it.""There are problems with communicating between DOORS and Microsoft Office.""It's difficult to set the code on the solution.""The software and GUI is very outdated."

More IBM Rational DOORS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay."
  • "IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions."
  • "It is expensive to onboard additional users."
  • "It's expensive."
  • "I don't personally know what the numbers are. I just know that one of the reasons we've limited it to three seats is a function of cost."
  • "I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars."
  • "IBM Rational DOORS is highly expensive."
  • "We have to pay for a license. I think it's a one-time payment as my company hasn't notified me about more charges. I don't think it's expensive for large corporations, but it will be costly for an average person."
  • More IBM Rational DOORS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:3SL Cradle's most valuable feature is its flexibility in managing all your needs immediately.
    Top Answer:The support is consistent globally. However, heavier support is provided in certain locations. Improvement in support is necessary. Assistance is available to acquire information and utilize… more »
    Top Answer:I mainly use 3SL Cradle to manage the requirements from service projects.
    Top Answer:The traceability matrix in DOORS improved our project outcomes. It helps ensure coverage of requirements at different levels, from user requirements to software requirements to test requirements.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive. It was a little bit expensive.
    Top Answer:The modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool like DOORS Next Generation, integrated with Rhapsody. So, integration between Rhapsody modeling and DOORS in the web tool. Another area of… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    445
    Comparisons
    291
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    236
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    10,182
    Comparisons
    6,535
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    583
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cradle
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cradle is a requirements management and systems engineering tool that integrates your entire project lifecycle in one, massively scalable, integrated, multi-user product.

    IBM Rational DOORS is a requirements management tool whose software makes it easy to analyze, capture, trace, and manage changes to information.

    IBM Rational DOORS Features

    IBM Rational DOORS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Requirements Interchange Format
    • Rational DOORS Web Access
    • Test Tracking Toolkit
    • Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC)
    • Requirements definition and management capabilities
    • Work item system for task management and planning
    • Reporting system

    IBM Rational DOORS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing IBM Rational DOORS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Simple predefined change proposal system: By using IBM Rational DOORS, you can manage changes to requirements via a simple predefined change proposal system or a more customizable and thorough change control workflow.
    • Linking: With IBM Rational DOORS, you can link requirements to test plans, design items, test cases, and other requirements, making traceability easier.
    • Collaboration-friendly: Business analysts, business users, systems engineers, and marketing suppliers can collaborate directly through requirements discussions.
    • Boosts productivity: IBM Rational DOORS traces requirements and eliminates manual processes and spreadsheets, thereby improving productivity.
    • Cost-efficient: Because IBM Rational DOORS effectively manages the requirements of its users, it helps reduce development costs.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the IBM Rational DOORS solution.

    PeerSpot user Juergen A., System Engineer, Requirements Engineer, Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH, says, “One of the most valuable features of the program is the usability. It is really simple to use and its logic, look and feel are familiar to most customers. Let's say it is more of an old-fashioned interface design. If you look at the software, you will notice that the layout is similar to the old Microsoft Windows Explorer. This is helpful to customers who have long-term experience because the look and feel is something they remember from the structure of Explorer and they find it familiar when they go to use DOORS.” He also adds, “There are several other features in the product that are valuable to users and to us. These features would have to do with the traceability and the possibilities for customization of the RP (Relying Party). This is important because several of our clients run an awful lot of customizations.”

    A Project Manager at a tech services company mentions, "We have different generations of all products. It lets us select and see unique attributes for each release or generation. You can use attributes to define a selection area to see which equipment are for the old versions and which ones are for the new versions. This inbuilt view is what I like in IBM Rational DOORS. So, for a database and a set of requirements, it will select and show unique attributes for a release or a generation."

    A Sr. Systems Engineer at a manufacturing company comments, “I like the user interface with regard to creating links between requirements and tracing links to requirements. I like the DXL Wizard, in particular, to build custom views that I save. I am a fan of the DOORS Change Proposal System, although a lot of people where I'm working have their own homegrown system. I continue to push them to migrate to the DOORS CPS.”

    Julie K., Lead Modeling & Simulation Engineer at a tech services company, explains, “Being able to track changes to requirements and being able to export is the solution's most valuable aspect.”

    Sample Customers
    NASA, In-Depth Engineering Corporation, Avibras
    Infosys, Chevrolet Volt
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Aerospace/Defense Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company25%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm23%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Transportation Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm7%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational DOORS
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about 3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational DOORS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    3SL Cradle is ranked 11th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while IBM Rational DOORS is ranked 1st in Application Requirements Management with 51 reviews. 3SL Cradle is rated 8.0, while IBM Rational DOORS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of 3SL Cradle writes "Flexible solution that manages all your needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational DOORS writes " Offers ability to automate tasks and to track changes within documents and compare different versions of requirements but modeling capabilities could benefit from a web-based tool ". 3SL Cradle is most compared with Jira, whereas IBM Rational DOORS is most compared with Polarion Requirements, Jira, Jama Connect, Helix ALM and OpenText Dimensions RM. See our 3SL Cradle vs. IBM Rational DOORS report.

    See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.

    We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.