We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and ElectroNeek based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that it has the capability of processing a high volume of documents with great accuracy."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It is easy to use and configure."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to capture data from documents with different formats."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale for big processes. We are able to process 1 million pages a day. Its accuracy is also very nice. It is a good feature that they have. It is an independent platform, which is its biggest advantage as compared to other solutions. It is also very stable and powerful. It is 100% on time."
"It saves us a lot of manual work."
"The initial setup is not difficult. The vendor provides technical documents to assist with deployment."
"Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"Time-saving with increased levels of accuracy."
"The solution is user-friendly with a really good UI and ID."
"My favorite feature is that you can have unlimited bots without having to buy more licenses. That's a powerful option for scalability."
"We find the OCR feature very valuable, due to the corrector recognition that it provides; this is very useful for document processing."
"ElectroNeek was extremely easy to use, especially its UI was easy to navigate with limited training."
"The cost is the best thing about ElectroNeek."
"The product's setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is the price."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"In IRISXtract, we can have master data, and we can set the master data. There are more options for taking any data and comparing it with master data. For a project, they have a dump from SAP for validation. This feature is there in ABBYY, but it is not extensive like IRISXtract. ABBYY is capturing the data, but there are not a lot of options to validate the captured data. It would be helpful if there are more options for validating the captured data in ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"The price for trainings or certifications are on the very, very high side."
"Their tutorials are not enough. They can improve the tutorials and maybe add more examples in their tutorials. Currently, if you want to learn ABBYY technology, it is very difficult. There are just a few resources, such as YouTube channels and blogs. There are not many resources for learning ABBYY."
"I think that technical support should help instead of developing a solution from scratch every time you reach out to them."
"The recognition intelligence could improve by having more details in the documents. There are limitations with the forms, templates, and manuscripts."
"It would be good if the product provided an AI-based prebuilt model that predicts and gives output."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve in the maintenance, and there are some issues. You have to make efforts to do corrections. Additionally, it could be more user-friendly in terms of connecting between different solutions."
"Customization in the solution needs to be modified. In the future, I would like to see the product have better customization functionality."
"When I wanted to use web scraping for tables in web applications, I found through online forums that such functionality or activity is currently not working as it shows."
"The solution works well with Google Chrome, but not with Microsoft Edge, which is the browser we use for automation."
"Its price could definitely be lower."
"I think that this solution could improve remote desktop interactions."
"The pricing is an area with a shortcoming, and from an improvement perspective, it needs to be made cheaper."
"It's not applicable to very large enterprises and for difficult work or more complex processes."
"The integrating capability of the product needs to be improved, to ensure that it works with all systems involved in a process."
"ElectroNeek comes with three activities and we cannot add activities like we can with uiPADs."
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 6th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while ElectroNeek is ranked 20th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 9 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while ElectroNeek is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ElectroNeek writes "User-friendly, good UI, but does not work well with Microsoft Edge". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, HyperScience, Microsoft Power Automate and Tungsten TotalAgility, whereas ElectroNeek is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Robocorp. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. ElectroNeek report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors, best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors, and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.