Mimecast email security solution was reviewed positively for its robust spam filtering, and customizable protection settings. Abnormal Security is lauded for its behavioral AI engine and strong defense against phishing attacks. Some improvements suggested for Mimecast include enhancing technical support and pricing competitiveness, while Abnormal Security users have mentioned the need for better integration options with mail platforms. Mimecast and Abnormal Security users reported different implementation times, with some experiencing longer deployment than others, ranging from several weeks to a few days.
The summary above is based on 43 interviews we conducted recently with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection and Abnormal Security users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"Their ability to take things out of the mailbox and catch things much faster than users is excellent."
"It does some really cool stuff that other tools aren't doing. We found it to be really effective, and the AI/ML functionality is really what differentiates them."
"Ease of use is undoubtedly one of the most valuable features of Abnormal Security."
"One of the things that I love about them is that the setup and installation are super easy. All you do is give them access to your Microsoft 365 tenant, and through APIs, they are able to do their work. They are doing all this through APIs, so you do not have to install the software and take a month to get it all set up to even see the value of the solution. You could be up and running in less than an hour."
"What I like about Abnormal Security is that it notifies me if any of my partners or suppliers are experiencing a security breach by analyzing their database and identifying potential cyber threats."
"The features that appeal to me most are the combination of auto-remediation and Detection 360."
"I have never encountered any stability issues with Abnormal."
"Initial auto-remediation allows us to auto-remediate before the email lands in the end user's inbox for a split second."
"Its administration console is very easy to use. The administration console is absolutely important because you interact with the platform through it."
"What I like about the integration is that it is directly into Microsoft 365, users can use their Microsoft 365 credentials to log into the portal and access their mail."
"It does a good job for us, and its admin console is easy to use."
"The interface of this solution is very easy to navigate and user-friendly. There is no delivery in email and other communications, making it reliable. The configuration is relatively easy."
"The most valuable feature is the DMARC Analyzer."
"The solution offers good technical support."
"The integration is straightforward."
"It offers an easy initial setup."
"There could be room for improvement in enhancing integration with other cybersecurity tools."
"I, as such, do not have anything that I do not like or would like to add, but you could argue that because they are doing it API-based, there is a chance that something could slip through temporarily before they are able to pull it out. In theory, it could happen just because of the nature of the system. They are not in line with the delivery of the mail. They are kind of asynchronous, which is a pro as well as a con. If it is synchronous, then I know it would always stop them, but because it is asynchronous, things could get through temporarily or because of some system issues on the Microsoft side or their side. It is the nature of the beast, but it is a little bit of a con."
"The ideal scenario would be for Abnormal Security to work in tandem with Microsoft to analyze incoming emails."
"I would like to have the ability to customize the auto-remediation feature."
"The pricing for academic institutions and student mailboxes is challenging."
"When we're working on something as engineers, and we find an idea or a method of doing something that would be greatly improved by doing it another way, there should be an ability for me to click the ideas button, type in an idea that I have, and submit it to a product review team or developers to have them think through the process a little bit more."
"The biggest pain point for us is the lack of support for on-premise email systems."
"One feature I'd love to see is outbound scanning."
"They could provide a unified licensing model, including all the security features."
"We have subscribed to an archival service, and yet, when we have to get our data out, we have to pay a fee to get our own data. They charge an extraction fee."
"The platform's cost-effectiveness could be improved."
"While it's quick and easy, the initial setup could be more user-friendly."
"The solution's console interface was recently changed for the admins, but the previous one was much better because we could open tabs on it."
"Its pricing can be improved. It is a bit expensive."
"The reaction time between a new threat being identified and Mimecast picking it up needs to be narrowed a bit."
"They should improve the cookies management feature."
Abnormal Security is ranked 4th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 8 reviews while Mimecast Email Security is ranked 5th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 25 reviews. Abnormal Security is rated 9.6, while Mimecast Email Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Abnormal Security writes "Provides comprehensive email security management, effective in detecting a wide range of email threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mimecast Email Security writes "It gives clients peace of mind and helps them educate their users about threats". Abnormal Security is most compared with Egress Intelligent Email Security, Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Cloudflare Area 1 Email Security, Avanan and Cisco Secure Email, whereas Mimecast Email Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, Cisco Secure Email and Darktrace. See our Abnormal Security vs. Mimecast Email Security report.
See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.
We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.