We performed a comparison between Acumatica and NetSuite ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution supports multiple branches."
"The way everything integrated well with everything else was most valuable. We had one solution for everything, from the first phone call down to follow-up visits for wholesale callers and for just regular purchases."
"The inventory feature in NetSuite ERP is very valuable to me because it provides clear estimates about the depreciation of details and includes useful mobile modules."
"We leverage the core platform but are able to add additional functionality for ease of use, tailored processes, and industry related reporting."
"NetSuite ERP is good for a trading company that involves buying and selling."
"The most valuable aspect of NetSuite ERP is the multi-subsidiary portion, it is the strongest across all the other ERPs. If you want to do consolidations, it works a lot better than other tools."
"It is a very solid product for finance and procure-to-pay processes."
"I am impressed with the product's ease of use. It also helps us reduce the techstack."
"It offers reporting flexibilities that were previously unavailable to us."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution doesn't have features to break down the structure for multiple people in the project."
"We should be able to personalize it for the company. There should be more customization of the pages so that they seem more like a company rather than as an outside company. We should be able to change company images and things like that and do this kind of personalization."
"For support, we go through a distributor, and the support we receive from them is much better than what we would from Acumatica directly. When we went to Acumatica support directly, we were not happy with it."
"As with any system offering large volumes of data, there are limitations on processing large volumes of data in custom ways."
"The areas that this product needs to improve on is the implementation and inventory processes."
"Some of the features around the payroll and payroll taxes and management of that are lacking. We had to outsource some of that because we found that the functionality isn't there."
"The communication has been peculiar, and the overall commercial process has been less than satisfactory."
"An area for improvement in NetSuite ERP is its accounting functionality because it has certain limitations. You can't maintain sub-ledgers or post accrued expenses in sub-ledger forms, so you'll need to post in journals. The pricing is another area that can be improved in NetSuite ERP because the pricing was lower when it wasn't part of Oracle, but after Oracle acquired Netsuite and NetSuite ERP was offered as a cloud service, the price went up."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The product should improve its warehouse management solution."
"The solution's initial setup process was complex."
Acumatica is ranked 6th in Cloud ERP with 3 reviews while NetSuite ERP is ranked 1st in Cloud ERP with 33 reviews. Acumatica is rated 8.0, while NetSuite ERP is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Acumatica writes "Provided one solution for everything and housed everything for us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite ERP writes "Carries a broad range of applications, specifically in the field services area". Acumatica is most compared with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, HubSpot CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, SAP Business ByDesign and SAP S/4HANA Cloud, whereas NetSuite ERP is most compared with Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, NetSuite OneWorld, SAP S/4HANA, Oracle E-Business Suite and Anaplan. See our Acumatica vs. NetSuite ERP report.
See our list of best Cloud ERP vendors.
We monitor all Cloud ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.