We performed a comparison between ADOIT and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about LeanIX, Sparx Systems, erwin by Quest and others in Enterprise Architecture Management."It helps me to model the architecture at an enterprise level."
"The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs."
"It is a very flexible product. It can do a lot. It is also a reliable product."
"It is simple to build the first model for the solution."
"Its traversability is most valuable. I can use ArchiMate, and I can create a UML model. ArchiMate is for logical enterprise architecture, UML is for software engineering, and BPMN is for business processes. I can build it to have multiple models, and they are also traversable, which is not something that every tool allows. If there is a huge organization, you can segment it and have separate models for business technology or internal resource management system. You don't need to keep them in one model, and you can decide to segregate them."
"The advantages of Enterprise are that it's cheaper and much more practical than MagicDraw."
"The profiles and ready-made templates are an extremely helpful feature. This is one of the biggest features that I find very useful in Sparx."
"Ability to model and create view under same roof."
"The TOGAF ADM model is most valuable. It is also very cheap as compared to other options in the market."
"We use it to develop and maintain the Enterprise Conceptual Model, migrated from erwin a couple of years ago."
"The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system."
"We need to understand how the data could be segregated."
"In general, we now have a problem with Sparx Enterprise Architect because many analysts think it's too complicated to use in a giant environment."
"Its best features are not intuitive or easy to learn. Most companies I have worked with, when I see what they are doing with it , are not using more than 5% of what they could and should be doing with it."
"I have found the solution is lacking options. The general usability needs improvement and more compliance to CML definitions."
"The solution needs to offer better support for the mobile-based system. Right now, it's not working."
"For data modeling, it is not very mature when comparing with other data modeling tools."
"It would be nice to have it supported on the Linux operating system."
"Greater OMG UML and XMI compliance"
"More challenging than other tools to maintain documents and document versions for an architecture board review."
More Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ADOIT is ranked 21st in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Architecture Management with 97 reviews. ADOIT is rated 9.0, while Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ADOIT writes "Helps to track the life cycle of products and services, and understand their costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect writes "Easy to set up and had no issues with stability, but it's not a very friendly tool, and its database modeling and entity-relationship modeling functions need improvement". ADOIT is most compared with LeanIX, MEGA HOPEX, Ardoq and BiZZdesign HoriZZon, whereas Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is most compared with Visual Paradigm, Visio, No Magic MagicDraw, Lucidchart and SAP Signavio Process Manager.
See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
