We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing about Amazon API Gateway is that it can authenticate and authorize requests without going to our back end."
"What I like best about Amazon API Gateway is that it's simple to use, easy to set up, and you can quickly get it up and running. It's a very user-friendly solution. I also didn't experience any issues in terms of Amazon API Gateway interface, integration, or monitoring. The solution runs smoothly."
"It is very helpful, with our API-based applications."
"It's flexible. It was valuable."
"The technical support is very strong. We've had issues with the solution and configuration and we got very good support."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution is a managed service and requires minimal configuration, which makes it easy to launch an API."
"The product is stable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The solution is scalable."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"Since the first invocation of AWS Lambda takes more than 30 seconds because of Lambda's cold start, Amazon API Gateway blocks that resource, thereby aborting the invocation."
"Its performance and scalability could be better compared to one of its competitors."
"The tool's UI requires time to understand."
"There are certain restrictions that cannot be implemented without web access."
"The user interface, in general, can be better. The user interface for the entire Amazon cloud can be more friendly. There are some scenarios that are not really easy to manage and configure through the user interface."
"It's hard to configure. There's a lot of options but it's very hard, it's very confusing."
"Amazon API Gateway will wait for only 30 seconds to get a response from other services, such as the Lambda function."
"The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 37 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, WSO2 API Manager and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and StreamSets. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.