We performed a comparison between Apigee and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."If you have numerous applications and high traffic, Apigee is a strong choice for its excellent features and outstanding performance."
"API/proxy lifecycle workflow for API providers is quite good and one of Apigee's strongest features."
"The opportunity for customization is really vast and it is a really good feature built into the product."
"Apigee has better scalability than WSA."
"Apigee's best features are flexibility and breadth of capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is monetization."
"The security that you have with Apigee is very good and aligns with compliance."
"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."
"The solution is scalable."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"The technical support could be improved because their response time is slow."
"I don't have any notes for improvement."
"It is an expensive solution."
"More documentation on the Open Banking Standard will help."
"We need better performance monitoring."
"Proxy versioning seems a bit confusing/buried in the publishing experience, especially for the URI-based versioning approach."
"The account simplification process can be improved."
"The number one area this solution could be improved is by implementing support. Support is not a part of this solution."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, WSO2 API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Microsoft Azure API Management, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our Apigee vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.