We performed a comparison between Amazon AWS and Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Machine learning is a valuable feature."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"It streamlines tasks like table creation and data loading into Redshift, making the process more efficient and manageable."
"We can spin up the server anytime and have root access to it."
"The initial setup is easy. The deployment is fast."
"It is enough for us in terms of features. We don't have too many transactions, and it is sufficient for our current needs."
"The features that I have found most valuable are their compute and their Relational Database Service."
"The scalability of the product is the solution's most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Nutanix Clusters are Prism Central, Micro-segmentation, and cluster scaling automation."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Clusters is to protect the data."
"The most valuable feature is having the full features of my Nutanix on-premises applications in the cloud."
"The solution can scale well."
"In terms of dealing with our business-critical workloads, Nutanix is a highly scalable, highly resilient, and very high-performing solution."
"The scalability is good."
"The overall infrastructure is the most valuable part of Nutanix Cloud Clusters."
"I've been very pleased with their support overall."
"The feedback we are getting from our customers, especially here in Turkey where the exchange rate fluctuates regularly, is that the solution is quite expensive."
"Amazon AWS could be improved with cheaper licensing costs."
"AWS should provide even more support and engagement to accelerate the adoption of new services and features."
"One of the problems that I have seen is that some of the products are not as mature as others."
"I have trouble with the AWS command-line interface."
"In future releases, I would like to see more automation."
"There is room for improvement in cost. Everyone complains about AWS being expensive. The initial cost starts small but can skyrocket unexpectedly."
"I'm just bugged by the charges that I'm not really able to manage."
"There are still some things that could be improved about the product."
"The biggest weakness with Clusters at this point is that the adoption rate is low because customers don't know enough about it."
"I'd like more flexible options to get in and out of migration modes."
"Some of the interfaces aren't as intuitive as they should be."
"The technical support for Nutanix Clusters could be better."
"The reporting has room for improvement."
"The pricing can be better."
"We've had some challenges with the implementation."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 250 reviews while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is ranked 13th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 9 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Reliable with good security but is difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) writes "Helps manage costs, eliminates waste, and has excellent technical support". Amazon AWS is most compared with Linode, Microsoft Azure, Red Hat OpenShift, SAP Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), whereas Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) is most compared with VMware Cloud Foundation, Azure Stack, AWS Outposts, VMware Cloud on AWS and Google Anthos. See our Amazon AWS vs. Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2) report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.