We performed a comparison between ArcSight Logger and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."
"The machine learning is a good feature."
"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"It provides in-depth information on business activities once we log into the system."
"We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."
"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the alerting based on the security logs."
"The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is its performance and management. Additionally, the solution integrates well."
"The best thing about Kiwi Syslog is that it filters logs into different levels."
"Simplicity is the most valuable feature."
"We are very happy with the stability of the solution."
"It's not a new product and is a bit complex. So, it requires a person dedicated to working on it and to know about it in and out. It is a huge product, and the search operation is a bit complicated for a new user or someone who has not used it for long. So for that person, it becomes a bit difficult."
"We have had problems with archiving."
"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."
"ArcSight has been sold two or three times, and the quality has decreased."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex."
"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."
"The integration with other systems could be improved."
"The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved."
"SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server could improve by reducing the price."
"I would like to see a more user-friendly and customizable dashboard."
"Technical support could definitely be better."
"I would like to have email notifications for emergency logs."
"I would like to see better search functions and better filters in the next release."
More SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
ArcSight Logger is ranked 20th in Log Management with 31 reviews while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is ranked 32nd in Log Management with 5 reviews. ArcSight Logger is rated 7.8, while SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ArcSight Logger writes "A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server writes "Shows login failures and server issues but search functions and filters could be improved". ArcSight Logger is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Wazuh and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server is most compared with syslog-ng, SolarWinds Log Analyzer, Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Graylog. See our ArcSight Logger vs. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
