We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has the ability to scale up, as well as integrate with other systems within the organization to get real-time information from dashboards and reports."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"ARIS BPA has a good directory option, which helps to keep track of all of your metadata, and that's very useful."
"The most valuable features of ARIS BPA are its flexibility and reporting."
"The most valuable feature is the process documentation. For us, ARIS is a lifestyle more than a tool. It helps us learn how to think and how to plan for our system."
"The simulation engine and SAP integration are technically very robust."
"ARIS is probably the most mature product in terms of modeling an enterprise architecture so that it has context."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"There are some things in the collaboration module that could be improved a little, such as the functionality which dynamically pushes notifications to interested people when a process changes during the Release Cycle Management workflow."
"Newer versions (9.x) are technically more difficult to maintain."
"The Risk and Compliance Management tool is rather complex and moreover, it needs to be customized if you want to use it."
"With ARIS BPM, the script creation is quite cumbersome. With version ten, we needed our developers to do scripting."
"The product is difficult to use for someone without prior knowledge of working with it. It requires a certain level of administration training."
"Its governance tool and integration with ESB and execution engine can be improved. Their partner support can also be improved."
"Needs flexibility in automation of the modeling processes and real-time analysis of data, not just a static view."
"It would be helpful if ARIS BPA could have a simple database to get the extract of various attributes."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bizagi, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our ARIS BPA vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.