"The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"The technology is good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."
"The main advantage of Claroty, when compared to its competitors, is integrated secure remote access."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"Claroty Platform could improve the pricing to get more acceptability in the market."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
Armis is ranked 1st in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 4 reviews while Claroty Platform is ranked 2nd in Cyber-Physical Systems Protection with 2 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Claroty Platform is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Claroty Platform writes "Provides good visibility of the devices in a user's environment". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Forescout Platform, Axonius, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Claroty Platform is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Darktrace and Microsoft Defender for IoT.
See our list of best Cyber-Physical Systems Protection vendors.
We monitor all Cyber-Physical Systems Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
