We performed a comparison between Armis and Forescout Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IoT Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool is user-friendly and helps to detect vulnerabilities."
"Armis is a straightforward and user-friendly solution."
"The technology is good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is asset tracking."
"Obtaining visibility into the network and connected devices is very simple with this tool. It takes me three minutes to do a base deployment when all the parameters are available."
"Emergency response, risk assessment information to get a view of the of the vulnerability."
"The product is very easy to work with and easy to deploy."
"Provides a good overview of all devices on a network."
"I have noticed that in the last year the license model has changed from licensing the whole appliance to licensing the number of devices. It's more simple for a large installation, or a user to have CounterACT as their peripheral site in the company. It's a good choice to have changed the license policy."
"It's one of the tools that has given the federal government visibility into network devices and everything."
"The interface is easy to use."
"You can quickly filter your view of devices and zero in on the ones you want using a variety of tools, such as what subnet it is on or what it has been classified as."
"We face difficulties in integrating the product with ticketing tools like ServiceNow."
"The solution's vulnerability testing could be improved."
"We have faced issues with the tool's stability."
"Armis doesn't have a back intel feature."
"It does not support the TACACS+ protocol."
"We have found that the agent-based authentication, available within this solution could be improved."
"The licensing costs are quite high. With the amount of hardware we have, we need too many licenses to make the product effective and it's ultimately just too costly."
"As a user, if I am using a laptop that is Wi-Fi connected, Forescout identifies my port connectivity as one user license, and if I take that same laptop with the same username to a wired network, which is also the same network that is used for the Wi-Fi connection, Forescout detects it as a separate license."
"The cost is too high."
"Forescout needs to improve its cloud management and remote connectivity."
"Search - needs boolean functionality (or pseudo operand now working)."
"The solution needs more definitive pricing. The costs are hard to nail down."
Armis is ranked 3rd in IoT Security with 4 reviews while Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews. Armis is rated 8.0, while Forescout Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Armis writes "Improves device visibility and adapts according to an organization’s security demands". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". Armis is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Axonius, Claroty Platform, Tenable Vulnerability Management and Phosphorus Cybersecurity, whereas Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Nozomi Networks and Tenable Security Center. See our Armis vs. Forescout Platform report.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
