We performed a comparison between Aruba Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is that it is easy to configure. Additionally, with the same configuration with Cisco and Ruckus, we can receive 55 to 60 percent more out of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN."
"I rate the stability an eight out of ten."
"The most valuable features are price, quality, and performance."
"They offer per-user tunneling to a variety of endpoints."
"It's stable and reliable."
"It's quite stable."
"The most valuable feature of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is centralized management capability. You don't have to have wireless LAN controllers at every location."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the streaming of screen sharing."
"The connectivity, speed, and reliability are very good."
"The strongest point for Ruckus has always been the radio hardware."
"Ruckus has multiple radios. Therefore, it supports high speed for users and clients. Other vendors have fluctuations in speed. The main thing about Ruckus is that you can trust it and rely on its speed. I am simply satisfied with it."
"It's highly scalable as long as the licenses are in place. You can expand it easily."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of adding an access point."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN’s most valuable feature is unleashed."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN's best feature is its virtual controller."
"The price for the license could be a bit improved since it is the only area with an issue."
"When it comes to configuring rules for file security tests, any issues that arise can be referred to as "glitches". Despite the extensive configurations required, the process itself is not overly complicated."
"We do not have direct access to Aruba’s Mesh portal."
"It would be better for customers if Aruba provided more license options, like 5-year licenses"
"Aruba's technical support has room for improvement."
"Right now, the integration between the support that you are getting from Hewlett-Packard, which is the parent company, and Aruba, they're not meshing together."
"Aruba Networks Wireless WAN could improve the solution availability. The selection of mounting hardware for the various radios is limited and poor. Often, you have to create and manufacture your own mounting hardware in certain situations."
"The product offers a feature that pinpoints where the devices are to help users find them easily if they want to know where a laptop or tablet is, but it is a feature that needs improvements due to some shortcomings."
"We have one sole distributor here in our region. To have multiple distributors here would be very helpful to improve the supply chain."
"The initial setup is complex."
"I would like to see the billing system improved by adding a billing system integration."
"I would not consider this solution to be stable."
"The connectivity and mobility for users could be improved."
"In comparison to Cambium, I find Cambium to be more robust in terms of performance."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN we have a lot of component shortages in the world. This has impacted deliveries. We have large back orders of the solution."
"The interface has to be more automated."
Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 5th in Wireless WAN with 47 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.4, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Aruba Networks Wireless WAN writes "It's reliable, cost-effective, and easy to troubleshoot". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Aruba Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Ubiquiti Wireless and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless and Cambium Networks Wireless WAN. See our Aruba Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.