We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Box based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Liferay and others in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals)."The initial setup is very easy."
"It's easy to use and you can create all types of pages."
"The solution is stable."
"It's extremely intuitive."
"What I find the most valuable about Confluence is how easy it is to use."
"Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"The best feature is the automatic tagging of information in documents. The automatic algorithm highlights irrelevant information that conflict with the actual documents."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The application is very light in terms of uploading and downloading files."
"You can upload your bin, upload your files quickly, and download your files quickly. It provides a lot of other alternatives."
"Using Box for cloud storage allows us to focus on the service and maintaining infrastructure."
"Box is very user-friendly; more so than SharePoint."
"The collaboration of the solution is good."
"Office Integration. The full integration into the Microsoft Office products is just perfect."
"The solution is used for data storage and any kind of visualization."
"Box is very simple and effective, so I prefer Box."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"An area for improvement would be the intuitiveness of using the features, especially if you want to customize."
"The flexibility and simplicity of this solution could be improved. We would also like the ability to add plugins."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"Space maintenance could be made a little more user-friendly."
"The scalability for larger companies could be improved."
"The product is considered expensive."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"In future releases, there could be encryption, to have better security."
"With OneDrive, you can continuously save your files over a Box folder. That is something I wish we could have."
"Tasks and comments could be easier to see, report, search, and manage."
"The solution's data security should be improved."
"Like all cloud platforms, there are always areas of improvement around sync to local devices."
"I haven't really come across a case where we're not able to use it for what it is, so I don't really have anything holding us up or any customers holding us up at this point that I know of. There are always some limitations, but as a technologist, I just live with them, and there is always room for improvement, but I don't have anything quantifiable."
"Improvements in speed - Box's high level of security impacts performance, especially when compared with other similar services."
"I find their API to be quite complex and it could be more straightforward."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 39 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Box is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Box writes "Allows you to upload and download files quickly but lacks integration with Office 365". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Jive, whereas Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Alfresco.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
