We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Zendesk based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Knowledge Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have found limiting permissions and history very valuable."
"The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"The integration's very good. You still have integration with lots of third party products, and it's very good."
"A simple tool for developers to write and record team decisions explaining the product that they are creating."
"It is a very popular tool."
"For me, the most valuable feature is its high performance. It's crucial for us in the bank, as we handle a massive number of transactions every day."
"It is stable and reliable."
"With respect to our experiences with Confluence, we haven't had any issues."
"The feature to move over my customer experience team tickets for different specialists is very valuable for my team."
"It's a very stable tool, very powerful."
"The stability has been very good."
"It's very convenient to use."
"It is a scalable solution."
"One of the most valuable features is that Zendesk gives you a lot of configurability, and a lot of leeway in terms of customizing the look and theme. Zendesk offers you the facility to design your own landing page, as well as the look and feel of the entire knowledge base. At the same time, they offer themes that you can simply purchase and implement. Either way, it can really be turned into the right look and feel of the knowledge base required by our company, which is very important—if you have a bland-looking page, most of the time, people will lose interest. Zendesk also allows you to test the customizations before you publish it. It gives you a sandbox location where you can test everything new that you're trying to create and publish, which is very interesting."
"Its agility and simplicity are the most valuable features. This tool is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of Zendesk Support are collaboration, reports, and a self-service portal. The customer and team can see all the information needed from the portal."
"I think the couple of improvement areas would be around Markdown support and support for adding code."
"An area for improvement in Atlassian Confluence is encouraging more vital interaction among the project members or users involved. I was researching a tool that could be used for better interactions offline among users on a specific topic or discussion. That feature would make Atlassian Confluence better."
"It would be good if they can continue working towards making documentation and editing as quick and easy as possible. It has got a lot of capability, but I don't know how to use it. I don't find some of the things that intuitive. Sometimes, it doesn't seem obvious to me how to use it, but it is like learning any new tool. You actually need to get trained on the tool to get maximum out of it."
"Confluence could incorporate stronger records management and automation features. The current management structure is too open, which becomes an issue."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"I would like to see more macros provided by the company included in the license."
"I would like to see the text editor upgraded from its current limited abilities."
"As per me, there arent much significant issues or areas for improvement with Zendesk, as my usage of it is limited. I appreciate its ability to organize tickets effectively based on tags, allowing me to easily gather and analyze customer feedback and requests."
"There is always a network issue with Zendesk. But we don’t know whether it is managed. The network issue is that when I call, it does not let us."
"The data you get when logged in to Zendesk Support differs from the data you get when you programmatically query Zendesk Support through its API because of a sync time delay."
"They have something called Zendesk Explore, which isn't as good as what they had in place previously."
"Zendesk Guide's customization could be improved. I would like it to be easier and maybe open-sourced, so that if you have a developer in your company, you can do it yourself. Right now, that isn't allowed, so you need to have it done via the integrator. Another improvement—this is nit-picking—is that it could be less easy to make changes. Some things are so easy that they sometimes look a little amateur-ish. Most of the templates are built-in so they can be used directly, so they are very simple."
"It needs to improve in terms of its flexibility, price, and installation."
"The support team is time-consuming, and they don't find the answer to our problem."
"One of the drawbacks of Zendesk is that it doesn't provide a secure way for us to send data. So, we usually use a secure SharePoint folder link. We put that in the Zendesk ticket so that the requester has a secure way of getting to their data."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 1st in Knowledge Management Software with 99 reviews while Zendesk is ranked 2nd in Knowledge Management Software with 57 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Zendesk is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zendesk writes "Stable tool, making it reliable for handling tasks but difficult initial setup". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Zoho Learn, whereas Zendesk is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, Freshservice, Microsoft Dynamics CRM and Moveworks. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Zendesk report.
See our list of best Knowledge Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Knowledge Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.