We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and GitHub based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."
"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."
"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."
"The learning curve is small."
"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."
"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."
"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."
"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version."
"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."
"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."
"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."
"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."
"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."
"The storage for this solution could be improved."
"This solution could be improved by offering crowd sourced support where we could ask questions to other users."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Bitbucket and Checkmarx One. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. GitHub report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
