Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
9,698 views|7,133 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
GitHub Logo
4,163 views|1,715 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 20, 2023

We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and GitHub based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: The initial setup of Bitbucket can be complicated and requires some technical expertise, such as reverse proxy, DNS, and JVM settings. GitHub is considered easy to set up, with a rating of four out of five for ease of deployment.
  • Features: Bitbucket's valuable features include code reviews, DevSecOps support, and extensive merging, branching, and change management capabilities. GitHub offers a flexible platform with a diverse feature set, including the ability to pull from various sources.
  • Pricing: Reviewers say that Bitbucket is the most cost-effective solution among its competitors. GitHub has multiple tiers of pricing with a significant difference in price and features between its Premium and Ultimate versions.
  • Service and support: For Bitbucket, the support has been fine with no downtime, and it's rated an eight out of ten. For GitHub, the customer service is helpful, and it was rated either a four out of five or five out of five.

Comparison Result: Based on the parameters we compared, GitHub comes out ahead of Bitbucket. Although both products have valuable features and can be estimated as high-end solutions, our reviewers found Bitbucket has a complicated deployment process.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket vs. GitHub Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have approximately 300 to 400 users using this solution. Our whole organization uses it. I rate the scalability of Bitbucket an eight out of ten.""Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated.""The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management.""Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature.""The setup of Bitbucket is simple.""The tool's UI is better.""The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."

More Bitbucket Pros →

"We've found the technical support to be very helpful.""GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place.""The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.""We are finding GitHub is very stable.""The solution is scalable.""This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs.""It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product.""We use GitHub as a repository."

More GitHub Pros →

Cons
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash.""The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved.""The module component needs improvement.""Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools.""It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises.""Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve.""Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities.""Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."

More Bitbucket Cons →

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available.""It would be better if the amount of storage were increased.""Scalability is an area with a shortcoming, because of which it has room for improvement.""GitHub could expand the limits of the free version.""I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product.""It is difficult to merge a code or restore it to an older version.""We face issues with synchronization while working with teams.""The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

More GitHub Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
  • "With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
  • "Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
  • "We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
  • "I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
  • "I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
  • "Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
  • "When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
  • More Bitbucket Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The private repositories are free, which is very good."
  • "It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
  • "The price of this solution is reasonable."
  • "If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."
  • "We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."
  • "I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
  • "The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
  • "The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."
  • More GitHub Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
    Top Answer:In a small-scale company where I previously worked, cost-saving measures led to a transition from GitLab's dedicated servers to GitHub's cloud-based solution. This switch resulted in significant cost… more »
    Top Answer:The product could be less expensive for small companies.
    Top Answer: The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
    Top Answer:We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you buy extra support, you pay an additional cost.
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is high and should be reduced. Our company has a bundle product. Sometimes, people from outside our organization also need to collaborate with our code, and we need to integrate… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    9,698
    Comparisons
    7,133
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    332
    Rating
    8.5
    3rd
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    4,163
    Comparisons
    1,715
    Reviews
    56
    Average Words per Review
    359
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Snyk logo
    Compared 28% of the time.
    AWS CodeCommit logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Fortify on Demand logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Atlassian SourceTree logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

    There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

    1. Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.

    2. Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.

    3. Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.
    4. This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

    • Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
    • Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
    • Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

    Bitbucket Features

    Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.
    • Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.
    • Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.
    • Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.
    • Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.
    • Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.
    • Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.
    • Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

    Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

    GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.
    Sample Customers
    Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
    Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government9%
    Media Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    Large Enterprise41%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Bitbucket vs. GitHub
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 74 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while GitHub is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, Atlassian SourceTree, IBM Rational ClearCase and Liquibase, whereas GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Fortify on Demand, Atlassian SourceTree and Checkmarx One. See our Bitbucket vs. GitHub report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.