We performed a comparison between Azure Monitor and Honeycomb.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."The feature that I found most valuable in Azure Monitor is its monitoring abilities. With Azure Monitor, you are able to monitor all of your cloud resources across multiple subscriptions in one dashboard and create solution-specific alerts that can trigger an email to the team responsible for that specific solution."
"The solution has tons of valuable features."
"Recently, they have improved their integration with other resources, so we get even more robust data."
"The solution integrates well with the Microsoft platform."
"Azure Monitor's best features are its graphs and charts, the different visibility options, and reporting."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."
"I am monitoring all of my Azure Monitor and getting good reports. I can customize the reports to get the information I need. I am also getting emails about which AAS instances are down and everything in the system related to my services. It is easy to use, scalable, and user-friendly. Microsoft has Many guides and videos to help you understand how to create and use Azure Monitor."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward since we were getting enough support from Honeycomb.io's team."
"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."
"The process of implementation needs to be easier."
"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."
"n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler."
"The default interface should be improved."
"It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"Integration with third-party tools from other vendors than Azure is more time-consuming"
"The process of log scraping gets delayed on Honeycomb.io. At times, it gives false alerts to the application team."
Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 45 reviews while Honeycomb.io is ranked 36th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. Azure Monitor is rated 7.6, while Honeycomb.io is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Honeycomb.io writes "A valuable solution for application teams to identify downtime and SLO-related issues". Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Sentry, Prometheus and Instana Dynamic APM, whereas Honeycomb.io is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, Datadog, Chronosphere and AWS X-Ray.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
