We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and Rubrik based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides generally good performance, from protection to production to failover to data recovery."
"The most valuable feature is the visibility of what is happening with our business as well as the good reporting and dashboards."
"They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"The solution is secure, reliable, and scalable."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"We use the tool for business continuity purposes."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"Mounting recent backups to create new servers rather than cloning servers in VMware drastically cut down required time."
"I value the options it has for storage tiering (i.e. whether it should be a flash, SSD, or pushed to the cloud) depending on the data provided."
"The search functionality is second to none as the speed of the search is fast across the whole system and predictive."
"The file search feature across all backups has been helpful."
"When it comes to saving time managing our backups, Rubrik has saved us a lot of time compared to what we were using. It feels like it has saved us lifetimes of time because the process used to be difficult. It's not just the day to time savings. When something goes wrong, that's where the real time savings comes into play. We are able to get back to where we need to be more confidently and with much fewer steps."
"It has a good interface which is simple to navigate and utilize."
"Replaces legacy tapes and disk backups which are unreliable, expensive and space consuming."
"Rubrik has made the process to manage backup and recovery painless. This frees up more time to work on other projects."
"It is for site-to-site replication. When something goes wrong on your site, you only get 15 minutes before it also goes wrong on your replicated site. There should be some way to be able to say that we want to restore it, but we want to restore it to the version from yesterday. It should support versioning. I would also like to see real-time scanning for advanced threat protection, more straightforward billing, and quicker turnaround on the tech support."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"One area for improvement with Azure is helping customers predict usage more accurately."
"Could have more integration with other platforms."
"I would like to see more security features."
"It could include more of a backup and recovery."
"The tool should improve synchronization."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"We have some challenges with the solution's reporting because historical reports have some limitations."
"The recovery of Oracle databases is too complicated. It is not something that helps the DBA, the Database Administrator, but it should be done by the backup person like many other solutions. Everything is ready for the DBA to recover the database. It is a way of doing things, but I don't think you should give the backup people the ability to do it."
"They support Hyper-V and it works with our CloudOut, the cloud DR, but they seem to add features for VMware first and Hyper-V gets added second or sometimes several releases after the VMware feature comes out."
"The open source database needs to be supported."
"There is room for improvement through a further extension of their Office 365 backup platform. In addition, it's still a bit cost-prohibitive to backup NAS. Those would be the two primary areas for improvement."
"I would like for unmanaged backups to be able to be saved in a separate policy."
"I would like to see more information on encryption with the next release."
"Rubrik needs to continue to listen to their customers and what they want/need, not just care about money and the bottom line."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while Rubrik is ranked 4th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 86 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while Rubrik is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik writes "Automates the backup and recovery process, reducing manual human errors and global search allows for granular recoveries". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, whereas Rubrik is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Cohesity DataProtect, Commvault Cloud, Azure Backup and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain). See our Azure Site Recovery vs. Rubrik report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.