We performed a comparison between Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"Sandbox Analyzer, HyperDetect, and EDR are valuable to our customers."
"They are constantly updating the solution against malware."
"It's a very stable solution."
"One of the most valuable features is the signature updating in near real-time."
"The installation is straightforward."
"It is a very stable solution."
"The Ultra is a valuable feature."
"We have had no issues with the support and consider it to be good, even when it comes to accredited resellers."
"The pricing is decent."
"We've found the solution to be stable."
"The solution provides high-end security that is critical for financial institutions and bankers."
"Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response is a stable solution."
"My impression of the stability of this solution is good. We have not had any issues with stability."
"It's scalable enough for us."
"We have a central console and from there you can monitor all workstations via an agent."
"The most valuable feature of Kaspersky EDR is its simplicity. The console is easy to use and not very complex."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pros →
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"Detections could be improved."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"I would like to see the capability for remote installation added, in particular for servers."
"For many, the problems come mostly when they start tweaking or short-cutting - particularly for patch management."
"While the solution is secure, it could have better integration."
"In the future, maybe this will need to morph into AI threat intelligence."
"They were working on the encryption management for laptops, and if they complete it then it would be helpful."
"The firewall security could be better."
"In terms of improvement of the solution, it could have better features. For example, having a firewall within. This way we would only need one solution."
"The solution is sometimes resource-intensive."
"The solution lacks DLP."
"I would like to integrate Kaspersky with my Log Collector SIEM. Right now that's not possible."
"If a customer wants to use Kaspersky on-prem, they'll need to spend a lot on the hardware. Their server must be strong because EDR is a heavy product. You need excellent hardware to run it. It might make sense to deploy the solution in the cloud. If they add features, it will only make the product heavier and increase the hardware costs."
"Could include some additional protection."
"There is a problem with the solution, it came from Russia and we are looking for a replacement."
"Device control is lacking in EDR."
"The issue with Kaspersky EDR is the sandbox. I'd like to have the ability to manage it on the cloud as well."
"The prices can go down a little bit."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Cons →
More Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert Pricing and Cost Advice →
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 56 reviews while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is ranked 18th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 44 reviews. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is rated 8.6, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender GravityZone EDR writes "High-quality threat intelligence, including encryption and mobile device protection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert writes "Solid security and performance; overall a useful tool". Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is most compared with Trend Vision One, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cynet and IBM Security QRadar. See our Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.