Bitdefender Security for AWS vs ThreatLocker Protect comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bitdefender Logo
315 views|274 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ThreatLocker Logo
2,635 views|1,874 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bitdefender Security for AWS and ThreatLocker Protect based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Anti-Malware Tools Report (Updated: June 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The protection that it provides is valuable because the biggest problem that people and companies have been seeing in the last two or three years is scams and everything like that."

More Bitdefender Security for AWS Pros →

"The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.""ThreatLocker Allowlisting has all of these features integrated into one console, making it effective.""The sandbox functionality is fantastic.""While it can be frustrating at times, we appreciate the low-level security provided by the application whitelist.""Using ThreatLocker is effortless because I can access it from an app on my phone, so I can help clients after hours. My client had an issue while I was at dinner, and I didn't have a tech on the problem, but I could deal with it from my phone. I can see what the client is doing and approve or deny it. It helps me deliver better service to my clients when they need it.""The most valuable feature is probably the ability to block programs from running. ThreatLocker has some built-in features that make it super easy. You can also contact their support within the program. If you're having issues, you can click on that button and connect with someone in five to 10 seconds.""The most valuable feature is selective elevation, which allows elevating an individual process to admin privilege without granting admin privilege to that user, which has been by far the most useful feature outside of the overall solution itself.""Every single feature has been invaluable."

More ThreatLocker Protect Pros →

Cons
"I remember when they first pushed it to the DBM server, my backup server at the time, it caused a lot of issues because they were supposed to exclude all the folders that they were backing up to and had the storage. I got hold of the security group and asked them to uninstall it. We uninstalled it, ran a script, and then it fixed the problem."

More Bitdefender Security for AWS Cons →

"ThreatLocker could offer more flexible training, like online or offline classes after hours. The fact that they even provide weekly training makes it seem silly to suggest, but some people can't do it during the day, so they want to train after work. They could also start a podcast about issues they see frequently and what requires attention. A podcast would be helpful to keep us all apprised about what's going on and/or offline training for those people who can't train during the week.""Adding applications to the allowlist can sometimes feel overwhelming.""The portal can be a little overwhelming at times from an administration point of view. It displays a lot of information, and it's all useful. However, sometimes there is too much on the screen to sift through, especially if you're trying to diagnose a client's problem with a piece of software. Maybe something has stopped working since they updated it, and we need to see if ThreatLocker is blocking a component of that software.""ThreatLocker Allowlisting needs to improve its user interface and overall workflow.""The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself.""From a reporting perspective, enhancing the ability to customize reports would be beneficial.""There are some times when applications get submitted, the hashes don't really line up.""The reporting could be improved."

More ThreatLocker Protect Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was included in the account that we had. We didn't have to pay for it."
  • More Bitdefender Security for AWS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Others say ThreatLocker is too expensive, and I tell them they're dreaming. It's well-priced for what it does."
  • "Considering what this product does, ThreatLocker is very well-priced, if not too nicely priced for the customer."
  • "The price is very reasonable, and we have been able to integrate ThreatLocker with all of our clients."
  • "The pricing works fine for me. It's very reasonably priced."
  • "The pricing is fair and there is no hard sell."
  • "The price of ThreatLocker Allowlisting is reasonable in the market, but it is not fantastic."
  • "I find ThreatLocker's pricing to be reasonable for the services it provides."
  • "I believe ThreatLocker's pricing model is fair and flexible, allowing account managers to offer customized deals based on our specific needs."
  • More ThreatLocker Protect Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The protection that it provides is valuable because the biggest problem that people and companies have been seeing in the last two or three years is scams and everything like that.
    Top Answer:It was included in the account that we had. We didn't have to pay for it.
    Top Answer:I remember when they first pushed it to the DBM server, my backup server at the time, it caused a lot of issues because they were supposed to exclude all the folders that they were backing up to and… more »
    Top Answer:The interface is clean and well-organized, making it simple to navigate and find what we need.
    Top Answer:ThreatLocker's pricing seems justifiable. We get a lot of value for what we pay, with excellent support, the program itself, and everything related to it being top-notch. If my CTO ever suggested… more »
    Top Answer:The snapshots used in the ThreatLocker University portal are outdated snippets and have not been updated in conjunction with the portal itself.
    Ranking
    28th
    out of 110 in Anti-Malware Tools
    Views
    315
    Comparisons
    274
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    345
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    2,635
    Comparisons
    1,874
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    1,919
    Rating
    9.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ThreatLocker Allowlisting, ThreatLocker Network Control, ThreatLocker Ringfencing
    Learn More
    Bitdefender
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Bitdefender Security for AWS is a security solution designed for the Amazon cloud infrastructure and integrated with the GravityZone Cloud Console. Bitdefender Security for AWS is built for virtualization, offers flexible pricing, and scales to your size and needs for optimal return on investment.

    The ThreatLocker platform is a robust Zero Trust endpoint security solution, safeguarding organizations against ransomware, malware, and various cyber threats through a unified approach. It incorporates key features like Application Allowlisting, Ringfencing, and Dynamic Network Control. Application Allowlisting ensures that only authorized applications run on endpoints, preventing unauthorized software and thwarting ransomware and malware threats. Ringfencing isolates approved applications from one another and the operating system, inhibiting malware spread and unauthorized access to sensitive data. Dynamic Network Control regulates traffic, enhancing security by closing unused ports and opening them as needed for authorized connections. The ThreatLocker platform simplifies security management with a centralized console and supports Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints. 

    Sample Customers
    Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company39%
    Retailer6%
    Government5%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business93%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise31%
    Buyer's Guide
    Anti-Malware Tools
    June 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, ESET and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: June 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bitdefender Security for AWS is ranked 28th in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review while ThreatLocker Protect is ranked 26th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. Bitdefender Security for AWS is rated 8.0, while ThreatLocker Protect is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Bitdefender Security for AWS writes "Provides good protection and works well when configured correctly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatLocker Protect writes "Integration is simple, deployment is straightforward, and extensive well-written documentation is available online". Bitdefender Security for AWS is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Hornetsecurity Email Spam Filter and Malware Protection, whereas ThreatLocker Protect is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Huntress and GravityZone Business Security.

    We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.