We performed a comparison between BMC Helix Discovery and IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."I like the artificial intelligence and machine learning that it uses in the solution. Because once the solution discovers all the assets, all the infrastructure, and all the dependencies between services, it learns how it works. So, it learns to predict when a problem is going to happen. It becomes predictive in an autonomous way."
"Start anywhere application modelling brings a fantastic opportunity for users to see what is where."
"The data models are the most useful aspect of the solution."
"BMC provides great support. As managed service support, they are gold."
"The tool's accuracy of the results we receive looks promising in general. Its values are more than 95 percent accurate compared to other clients or different tools. I would say that Discovery offers a valuable mechanism to discover information."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its application dependency mapping."
"It is a stable solution. The stability is okay."
"IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface."
"Management of its own application infrastructure and integrations with other BMC tools."
"The solution is definitely useful."
"The improvement which we require is to delete the Internet service. Till some of the features are coming, like, internally side. If you are taking one server to model, there are a lot of usages like three structures per diagram is coming, and we have to do the man lot of manual work. Instead of that, whatever our requirement, we should be able to provide the servers and get the structure. So this is what we want to implement with such data."
"The license model could be more flexible and cheaper pricing."
"I would like to see the ability to scan some of the newer cloud platforms. I know that BMC has them on the roadmap, and they are coming soon, but they can't come fast enough. Being able to scan more of GCloud, Alibaba Cloud, or whatever the public clouds that our customers are buying, we need to make sure that Discovery can find them as well."
"The product falls short compared to storage discovery mechanisms offered by Tenable or ServiceNow ITOM. In the market, there are various applications available that provide different sets of features. Its drawback is that it doesn't give the database configuration customers need out of the box. Additionally, the classification of storage virtualization is relatively lacking. Therefore, there is room for improvement, particularly in the database areas."
"It would be nice to see more updates to the solution."
"We would like updates more often."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough."
More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC Helix Discovery is ranked 2nd in IT Asset Management with 20 reviews while IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 17th in IT Asset Management with 1 review. BMC Helix Discovery is rated 8.6, while IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of BMC Helix Discovery writes "Definitely useful but the old technology makes customizations very difficult". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT writes "A user-friendly solution that has a good user interface, but its technical support is not good enough". BMC Helix Discovery is most compared with ServiceNow, BMC Remedy , Device42, ServiceNow Discovery and Qualys VMDR, whereas IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with ServiceNow, BigFix and Microsoft Configuration Manager.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.