We performed a comparison between Broadcom Network Flow Analysis and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"This solution has helped our organization by allowing us to have visibility. We deal with cybersecurity, so visibility is very important."
"It is an overall stable solution."
"The solution's reporting engine has given me detailed information on which applications or services I've either failed or about to fail in terms of the predictive makeup on Azure cloud."
"The tool helps to monitor Windows servers. It offers alerts from a central location."
"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."
"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."
"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."
"SCOM has helped us to monitor all the VMs in our environment, especially the Windows servers."
"The monitoring features are the most valuable. We have seen a major benefit from that so far."
"Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"Currently, Broadcom Network Flow Analysis does not support high-availability solutions, making it an area that needs improvement."
"I would like to see more security features, like a lost protection package."
"Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable."
"It lacks certain details that other products do better, like granular access and better application monitoring."
"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."
"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."
"The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"In terms of features that could be improved, I would say the agent integration into the operating system. We are having difficulties integrating Linux into some of the networking devices."
"Direct integration with third-party tools, like ticketing systems, is lacking but would be beneficial."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Broadcom Network Flow Analysis Pricing and Cost Advice →
Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is ranked 65th in Network Monitoring Software with 6 reviews while SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews. Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is rated 8.4, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Broadcom Network Flow Analysis writes "A stable tool that helps identify the complete flow analysis in a network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". Broadcom Network Flow Analysis is most compared with WatchTower Security Management App and Wireshark, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and ManageEngine OpManager. See our Broadcom Network Flow Analysis vs. SCOM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.