We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and SCOM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."
"We use the solution to monitor links. It also helps us to track servers and monitor logs."
"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."
"Monitoring is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."
"The solution is scalable."
"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash."
"This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis."
"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."
"I like the historical reporting of observer metrics."
"I enjoy its integration with the Microsoft Active Directory functions, which means users, computers, or other group policies can connect with Windows Active Directory."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes."
"The solution is used for monitoring the hardware inventory. For instance, it helps with the whole operational monitoring view for the company's infrastructure."
"We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"There should be an option to get mobile notifications or SMS mirror notifications for critical issues. That way, when we don't have access to email, we can still receive notifications via our phones."
"OpManager is slow but that just might be the server we have it on. I don't think that's the problem but I don't do the server. But it is slow. When you're interacting with it, it could be more nimble and could be faster."
"The licensing model is confusing."
"It is sometimes difficult to manage the user interface. It can get very complicated."
"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."
"We would like link monitoring included. At times we need to monitor those specific links closely."
"The integration with various OEM products could be simplified."
"We would like the solution's customize and build functionality to be more user-friendly."
"The solution can be improved by expanding to cloud usage."
"Stability and some performance issues exist and they need improvement."
"The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved."
"The management of the servers could be better."
"The solution’s initial setup is difficult."
"Then there is also an issue with capacity and limited space. That is something that needs to be improved."
"It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards."
"The GI is difficult to work with and the reporting servers are also difficult."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 13th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while SCOM is ranked 10th in Network Monitoring Software with 78 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Nagios XI and WhatsUp Gold, whereas SCOM is most compared with Dynatrace, Zabbix, Datadog, Nagios XI and AppDynamics. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. SCOM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
