We performed a comparison between Carbonite Backup for Microsoft 365 and Commvault Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Zerto and others in Cloud Backup."We don't need to purchase any hardware for this solution."
"Its compression and deduplication allow us to store more backups and save storage space. The reporting is great; we are able to obtain critical business reports and infrastructure/usage information very easily."
"Well documented SQL views and customizable reports, together with scripts and workflows provides ability to automate processes and ensure proper controls are in place."
"There are many valuable features of Commvault HyperScale X giving many possibilities to complete jobs."
"The diversity on offer is very, very good. Everything is supported. It's great."
"The most valuable features are the ease of use, the graphical interface, and it's high speed."
"It runs all the tests and emails us the reports. We take daily, weekly, and monthly snapshots, and I integrate the storage snapshot scripts with the Commvault workflow. The Commvault workflow runs all the scripts and sends us the reports. It also features cloud-side reports and workflows. Commvault has many tools for backing up, restoring, and archiving things, but we use another service for our archives."
"The solution provides us with a single platform to move, manage, and recover our data across on-premise locations. Some of the guys have been using it to move a virtual machine from VMware to the Microsoft solution, Hyper-V. They back it up and then they restore to the different virtual machine provider, and that works great."
"The features I find most helpful in Commvault are its ability to perform incremental backups and significantly reduce backup times for our diverse multi-architecture, multi-environment environment."
"Lacks sufficient documentation or training videos."
"Commvault HyperScale X is more expensive for hybrid environments than traditional solutions."
"Its technical support could be better."
"There could be improvements to the backup failures."
"They reply to the support portal weekly, but there are some delays."
"Additional SaaS application support would be good... we have SaaS applications that may not be big enough for Commvault to support yet. Box.com is one we've asked about for years, and it's just not on the radar, as far as I know."
"The product's migration process and stability need improvement."
"It would be a bit unfair to say that it's complex, due to the fact that it supports so many different workloads, however, if there's anything that is a bit of a shortcoming, then it's the fact that there's a bit of complexity involved when dealing with the product."
"The workflow has room for improvement."
Carbonite Backup for Microsoft 365 is ranked 33rd in Cloud Backup with 1 review while Commvault Cloud is ranked 2nd in Cloud Backup with 104 reviews. Carbonite Backup for Microsoft 365 is rated 8.0, while Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Carbonite Backup for Microsoft 365 writes "Accessible from anywhere without the requirement to purchase hardware". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". Carbonite Backup for Microsoft 365 is most compared with SugarSync, whereas Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and AWS Backup.
See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.