We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical evaluation is very good."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"I am getting much better performance than relational databases."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"The solution's database capabilities are very good."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the enterprise data platform."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"Very good end-to-end security features."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The most valuable feature is that I can use CDH for almost all use cases across all industries, including the financial sector, public sector, private retailers, and so on."
"I don't see any performance issues."
"Cloudera is a very manageable solution with good support."
"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"The security of this solution could be improved. There should also be a way to basically have a blockchain enabled storage with the HDFS."
"The user infrastructure and user interface needs to be improved, as well as the performance. The GUI needs to be better."
"This is a very expensive solution."
"While the deployed product is generally functional, there are instances where it presents difficulties."
"Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on."
"The dashboard could be improved."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Vertica, whereas Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, ScyllaDB and MongoDB. See our Cassandra vs. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.