Cassandra vs Couchbase comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
3,266 views|2,594 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Couchbase Logo
3,962 views|2,664 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Couchbase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Cassandra vs. Couchbase Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"A consistent solution.""We can add almost one million columns to the solution.""Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture.""I am getting much better performance than relational databases.""The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature.""Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover.""The solution's database capabilities are very good.""Our primary use case for the solution is testing."

More Cassandra Pros →

"The principal advantage of Couchbase is that we can have multiple database paradigms in the same product, without deploying multiple databases. We also like that it has lower latency, when compared to its competitor: Cassandra.""Sync Gateway is a great feature that supports the mobile application.""I have found the views to be very valuable.""The most valuable features are the ease of application and the merging of data.""The main advantages were associated with it being a no SQL database. It helped us send out metrics or rewards to multiple players in our game at a very low latency.""The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views.""It is pretty stable.""It is highly available for support and does not impact our operations significantly during failures."

More Couchbase Pros →

Cons
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly.""Maybe they can improve their performance in data fetching from a high volume of data sets.""The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions.""Interface is not user friendly.""The solution is limited to a linear performance.""Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit.""The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases.""The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."

More Cassandra Cons →

"It is very difficult to load the backup of the older version to the newer version.""The scripting language for this solution could be improved. A big selling point is that they're like SQL server but there is still quite a lot of missing functionality.""Couchbase could improve the design of the UI because it should be optimized for viewing statistics or a similar feature.""The failover and failback could be a bit easier. When I looked at it last time, it had to be manually done. It also took over an hour for us to rebalance all the nodes.""The platform's grouping features need improvement.""Needs some capacity planning to deal with too much memory, CPUs and displays.""We would like to have a better management of Kubernetes with the free, open source version of Couchbase. We don't have any major complaints other than that.""The performance could be quicker and better, especially in the querying process."

More Couchbase Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."
  • "There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."
  • "We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."
  • "We pay for a license."
  • "I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."
  • More Cassandra Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this solution is better than some of the other competitors."
  • "We estimate that it's not very expensive, however, the pricing that you can get from the account managers, e.g. the public pricing, could be a bit expensive."
  • "I wouldn't say Couchbase offers good value for money."
  • "It seems very reasonable. It's a lot cheaper than Redis, but we've got an enterprise license. So, it's about normal. It's not outrageous in price as far as we've seen. From Couchbase, there's no additional fee as far as I'm aware, but when you're integrating, there's an additional fee because a lot of times, they don't have an integration stack."
  • "I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for pricing as it is affordable."
  • "The licensing cost of Couchbase is quite expensive compared to other databases."
  • More Couchbase Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time… more »
    Top Answer:There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using… more »
    Top Answer:The whole stack is valuable, but the portion of the stack that we're finding really handy is the analytics engine because that allows us to take and pre-build views.
    Top Answer:Their security model leaves something to be desired. Their indexes could use some work, but once we found out what was going on with them, it became second. So, the biggest one so far is integrating… more »
    Top Answer:We're in the middle of building out a persistent cache layer using Couchbase. That's across multiple international regions, but we have other instances where we're using it for data stores and some… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    3,266
    Comparisons
    2,594
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.2
    2nd
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    3,962
    Comparisons
    2,664
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    896
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Oracle NoSQL logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Chroma logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    MongoDB logo
    Compared 47% of the time.
    ScyllaDB logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    CouchDB logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Aerospike Database 7 logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing. 

    It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model. 

    It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

    Couchbase is a versatile database solution for healthcare, automation, e-commerce, gaming, caching, and analytics. It supports 920 nodes and 420 clusters, making it scalable and extensible. Its valuable features include multiple database paradigms, low latency, dynamic API integration, Sync Gateway for mobile apps, and a user-friendly interface. 

    Couchbase has helped organizations with low latency metrics, large user updates, and cost-effective caching. Its built-in data replication and disaster recovery features make it a complete solution for various needs.

    Sample Customers
    1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota
    Amadeus, Cisco, Comcast, LinkedIn, GE
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    University13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cassandra vs. Couchbase
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cassandra vs. Couchbase and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Couchbase is ranked 2nd in NoSQL Databases with 11 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Couchbase is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Couchbase writes "No SQL cloud based solution used to manage unstructured data and push out large volumes of metrics at a low latency". Cassandra is most compared with MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB, Oracle NoSQL and Chroma, whereas Couchbase is most compared with MongoDB, ScyllaDB, CouchDB, Aerospike Database 7 and InfluxDB. See our Cassandra vs. Couchbase report.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.