We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."I am getting much better performance than relational databases."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"We can add almost one million columns to the solution."
"A consistent solution."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."
"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."
"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool performs well."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."
"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."
"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."
"Depending upon our schema, we can't make ORDER BY or GROUP BY clauses in the product."
"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."
"It can be difficult to analyze what's going on inside of the database relative to other databases. It can also be difficult to troubleshoot sometimes."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
"The installation is difficult."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Chroma, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.